Revision as of 00:13, 11 February 2008 editDaniel (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators75,520 edits notes← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:36, 11 February 2008 edit undoDaniel (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators75,520 edits +Next edit → | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
===Not included in privilege=== | ===Not included in privilege=== | ||
===Exceptions and ambiguities=== | |||
===Enforcement of privilege=== | ===Enforcement of privilege=== |
Revision as of 00:36, 11 February 2008
- This isn't official, as it hasn't been assented by the Committee yet. It's a proposal which will be put before them shortly. Do not cite this page until it has moved out of the userspace and forms part of the mediation policy.
FAQ
Included in privilege
The Mediation Committee has agreed that comments made in the following situations will be covered as part of privilege:
- Comments made on Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/* and Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for mediation/* pages where the case has been accepted by the Committee.
- Emails sent to either the mediator or any member of the Mediation Committee (during or about formal mediation proceedings), or the Mediation Committee's private mailing list.
- Any and all edits made on the Mediation Committee's private wiki if a case is mediated there.
- Any and all communication in other mediums (ie. IRC, Skype, etc.) where that was part of the formal mediation effort as instigated and presided over by the mediator.
Not included in privilege
Exceptions and ambiguities
Enforcement of privilege
Appealing an act enforcing privilege
Notes
- Provided that member isn't a party to the case in question, in which case the comments may not be privileged; please also see WP:AP#Hearing.
- See User:Mediation Committee.