| Revision as of 18:06, 13 February 2008 editN-HH (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers10,142 edits →POV Tag.← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:38, 13 February 2008 edit undoJaakobou (talk | contribs)15,880 edits →POV Tag.Next edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| :Er, it's a LIST, not an article about the policy per se. And in any event the intro already says "as a response to ..". And finally, be careful what you wish for - someone may come along and insert claims that the reason why Israel engages in this sort of activity is because it's a vicious, terrorist state that operates outside the boundaries of international law. Apologies for "stalking" btw. --] (]) 18:06, 13 February 2008 (UTC) | :Er, it's a LIST, not an article about the policy per se. And in any event the intro already says "as a response to ..". And finally, be careful what you wish for - someone may come along and insert claims that the reason why Israel engages in this sort of activity is because it's a vicious, terrorist state that operates outside the boundaries of international law. Apologies for "stalking" btw. --] (]) 18:06, 13 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::The barely noticeable disclaimer does not make the article neutral and there should be some addition of the mentioned input before we can call this article neutral. | |||
| ::Is there a good reason to exclude the information I mentioned? <b><font face="Arial" color="teal">]</font><font color="1F860E"><sup>'']''</sup></font></b> 22:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:38, 13 February 2008
I have removed the citation tag from the top of this article since most assassinations now have a ref. Joshdboz (talk) 13:33, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
POV Tag.
Article lacks reasoning for targeted killing and additional input on other possible suspects. Jaakobou 17:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- Er, it's a LIST, not an article about the policy per se. And in any event the intro already says "as a response to ..". And finally, be careful what you wish for - someone may come along and insert claims that the reason why Israel engages in this sort of activity is because it's a vicious, terrorist state that operates outside the boundaries of international law. Apologies for "stalking" btw. --Nickhh (talk) 18:06, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- The barely noticeable disclaimer does not make the article neutral and there should be some addition of the mentioned input before we can call this article neutral.
- Is there a good reason to exclude the information I mentioned? Jaakobou 22:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC)