Talk:Reliability of Misplaced Pages/to do: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 07:11, 17 February 2008 editRichard001 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers24,850 edits Self assessment?← Previous edit		Revision as of 07:14, 17 February 2008 edit undoRichard001 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers24,850 edits NamesNext edit →
Line 15:		Line 15:
	\|npov=		\|npov=
	\|infobox=		\|infobox=
	\|other= *Discuss changing the subject of the article to ~~the~~ broader ] (reliability being a more narrow subject, see ]		\|other= *Discuss changing the subject (or just the name) of the article to something a bit broader (e.g. ], ], ], ] etc) (reliability being a more narrow subject, see ]
	*Images: Perhaps a screenshot of a vandalized/inaccurate edit?		*Images: Perhaps a screenshot of a vandalized/inaccurate edit?
	}}		}}

Revision as of 07:14, 17 February 2008

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Expand : *Expand lead a little bit - three detailed paragraphs would be good for an article of this length.
- Should there be something on Misplaced Pages assessment of itself - e.g. the assessment scheme, WikiProjects, featured articles, peer review etc?
- Find references where called for
- Other : *Discuss changing the subject (or just the name) of the article to something a bit broader (e.g. quality of Misplaced Pages, quality and comprehensiveness of Misplaced Pages, evaluation of Misplaced Pages, perspectives on Misplaced Pages etc) (reliability being a more narrow subject, see Talk:Reliability of Misplaced Pages#Article name
- Images: Perhaps a screenshot of a vandalized/inaccurate edit?