Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
IM A FUCKIN BITCH< TELL ME HOW MUCH U HATE ME HERE
Welcome. ] ] </font></big><sup><small>]</sup></small> 11:06, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
== Thanks ==
Thanks for helping with my userbox--] (]) 08:50, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
:Your Welcome. ] ] </font></big><sup><small>]</sup></small> 10:06, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
== RFA thanks ==
== RFA thanks ==
Revision as of 07:36, 18 February 2008
Welcome to my talk page. Please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~)
I will reply on your talk page. Talk page is archived once a month. If this is important you can E-mail me here. Otherwise please add new messages at the bottom of this page. Thank you.KingLopez
Thanks for supporting me!My RfA passed with a final tally of 5 neutrals, 1 oppose and 148 supports, a turnout I couldn't have dreamed of. I'm going to do everything I can to help out the community, help with sysop tasks, and of course, contribute to the encyclopedia. If you ever need a hand with something, feel free to give a shout! Cheers! Master of PuppetsCall me MoP!☺17:57, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Yes, people who participate in RFAs, myself included, consider edit summaries very important. It's a quick way to let other editors see what you're doing. Plus, vandals don't usually use summaries, so it helps when checking watchlists. When I'm looking at mine, I check for edits by IP addresses, edits by users with a redlinked username, big changes, and edits without summaries. You'll pretty much have to start using them on almost all of your edits if you want to pass an RFA (either that or log 10,000 edits). Useight (talk) 05:32, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in my RfA! It was closed as successful with 74 supporting, 3 opposing, and 1 neutral. I will do my best to live up to the trust that you have placed in me. —Remember the dot18:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Those blocks were just over 1 year ago. Many editors feel that you have to be 6 months block-free, so you have that. However, there were two blocks in short succession, which could make the average !voter go from 6 months to 1 year. But, they were a year ago and you only had the account for a month at the time. I think you'll be fine. Useight (talk) 04:41, 14 February 2008 (UTC)