| Revision as of 23:01, 20 July 2005 view sourceBoothy443 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users30,616 edits re:nomination← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:12, 22 July 2005 view source JesseW (talk | contribs)Administrators11,796 edits WP:CP#July 9Next edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| No, if i thought i had a chance to be fairly looked at on the basis of my contributions to this site rather than my opinions of the, lack of standards for adminship, lack of accountability with the admins, my decision not to submit to arbitarity policies made on the fly, and how the current administration of the site seems to be more concerned with the idea of protecting their own backs then the protection of accuracy and neutrality of information provided and a policy of basic appeasement towards vandalism and people that are here to promote an agenda either from the right or the left in which many admins would rather ignore if it does not effect them or interject them selves in on one side or the other, among other things. I find the RFA not a election, for that is what it is, based on the qualifications of a user but no more then a popularity contest. --] | ] 23:01, 20 July 2005 (UTC) | No, if i thought i had a chance to be fairly looked at on the basis of my contributions to this site rather than my opinions of the, lack of standards for adminship, lack of accountability with the admins, my decision not to submit to arbitarity policies made on the fly, and how the current administration of the site seems to be more concerned with the idea of protecting their own backs then the protection of accuracy and neutrality of information provided and a policy of basic appeasement towards vandalism and people that are here to promote an agenda either from the right or the left in which many admins would rather ignore if it does not effect them or interject them selves in on one side or the other, among other things. I find the RFA not a election, for that is what it is, based on the qualifications of a user but no more then a popularity contest. --] | ] 23:01, 20 July 2005 (UTC) | ||
| == ] == | |||
| I've responded to the claims of copyvio in ], and, as you seemed to be involved with this page, I thought you ought to know. Thanks for your work on Misplaced Pages! ] 00:12, 22 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:12, 22 July 2005
Comments
re:nomination
No, if i thought i had a chance to be fairly looked at on the basis of my contributions to this site rather than my opinions of the, lack of standards for adminship, lack of accountability with the admins, my decision not to submit to arbitarity policies made on the fly, and how the current administration of the site seems to be more concerned with the idea of protecting their own backs then the protection of accuracy and neutrality of information provided and a policy of basic appeasement towards vandalism and people that are here to promote an agenda either from the right or the left in which many admins would rather ignore if it does not effect them or interject them selves in on one side or the other, among other things. I find the RFA not a election, for that is what it is, based on the qualifications of a user but no more then a popularity contest. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 23:01, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
WP:CP#July 9
I've responded to the claims of copyvio in Fatima bint Asad, and, as you seemed to be involved with this page, I thought you ought to know. Thanks for your work on Misplaced Pages! JesseW 00:12, 22 July 2005 (UTC)