| Revision as of 04:52, 22 July 2005 editKnowledge Seeker (talk | contribs)10,201 edits Please be nice← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:03, 22 July 2005 edit undoMaster Thief Garrett (talk | contribs)6,859 edits your votes on RfAsNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| ==Please be nice== | ==Please be nice== | ||
| I do not feel that your , "''rv/v by a lemming user, User:Ardonik, if you gonna say it to me then say it to all the admins that seem to be above policy, as long as i am be defamed then this is what you gonna get''" was appropriate. ]'s edit certainly was not vandalism; it was a polite comment left on your talk page. This is what talk pages are for: it is not vandalism to leave people comments on their talk pages. Boothy, are you sure you don't want to discuss the difficulties you've been having on Misplaced Pages? It seems lately all you are interested in is quarrelling with other users. You indicated to me once before that you were willing to discuss your concerns, but you never responded to my reply. I am still available, if you are still interested. — ] ] 04:52, 22 July 2005 (UTC) | I do not feel that your , "''rv/v by a lemming user, User:Ardonik, if you gonna say it to me then say it to all the admins that seem to be above policy, as long as i am be defamed then this is what you gonna get''" was appropriate. ]'s edit certainly was not vandalism; it was a polite comment left on your talk page. This is what talk pages are for: it is not vandalism to leave people comments on their talk pages. Boothy, are you sure you don't want to discuss the difficulties you've been having on Misplaced Pages? It seems lately all you are interested in is quarrelling with other users. You indicated to me once before that you were willing to discuss your concerns, but you never responded to my reply. I am still available, if you are still interested. — ] ] 04:52, 22 July 2005 (UTC) | ||
| == your votes on RfAs == | |||
| Hi, I'm just doing the rounds after my successful adminship promotion. But for you I've got something more involved than a cut-n-paste thank-you note. I have not seen an admin nomination yet that you did not oppose, and very few that you did not vote on at all. | |||
| I am unclear as to what your motive is by doing this, but it certainly does not make your votes seem to be very important if you do not even express a reason for why no-one meets your expectations. | |||
| If you are going to oppose all you see, please have the decency to at least explain your evidently strict criteria to them. Thank you for your time. :) ]<sup>]</sup> 11:03, 22 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:03, 22 July 2005
Sheep vote
Just to let you know that I deleted that sheep vote and told the person who created it that I was incredibly disappointed that he/she created it in the first place. Talrias (t | e | c) 13:25, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
Please be nice
I do not feel that your edit summary, "rv/v by a lemming user, User:Ardonik, if you gonna say it to me then say it to all the admins that seem to be above policy, as long as i am be defamed then this is what you gonna get" was appropriate. User:Ardonik's edit certainly was not vandalism; it was a polite comment left on your talk page. This is what talk pages are for: it is not vandalism to leave people comments on their talk pages. Boothy, are you sure you don't want to discuss the difficulties you've been having on Misplaced Pages? It seems lately all you are interested in is quarrelling with other users. You indicated to me once before that you were willing to discuss your concerns, but you never responded to my reply. I am still available, if you are still interested. — Knowledge Seeker দ 04:52, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
your votes on RfAs
Hi, I'm just doing the rounds after my successful adminship promotion. But for you I've got something more involved than a cut-n-paste thank-you note. I have not seen an admin nomination yet that you did not oppose, and very few that you did not vote on at all.
I am unclear as to what your motive is by doing this, but it certainly does not make your votes seem to be very important if you do not even express a reason for why no-one meets your expectations.
If you are going to oppose all you see, please have the decency to at least explain your evidently strict criteria to them. Thank you for your time. :) Garrett 11:03, 22 July 2005 (UTC)