Misplaced Pages

User talk:ජපස: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:43, 24 February 2008 editජපස (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers60,454 edits Another day, another block. I love you all.← Previous edit Revision as of 16:58, 24 February 2008 edit undoSandstein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators188,358 edits decline unblockNext edit →
Line 13: Line 13:
==Unblock== ==Unblock==


{{unblock|Please see ]. There seems to be some misunderstanding that the blocking admin had with regards to the timeline. Please unblock me so that a proper review can be made of the situatiaon at AE. ] (]) 13:31, 24 February 2008 (UTC)}} {{unblock reviewed|1=Please see ]. There seems to be some misunderstanding that the blocking admin had with regards to the timeline. Please unblock me so that a proper review can be made of the situatiaon at AE. ScienceApologist (talk) 13:31, 24 February 2008 (UTC)|decline=Your link does not convince me that the blocking admin acted in error was an incivil comment, regardless of whether or not you later retracted it, and under what circumstances. — ] (]) 16:58, 24 February 2008 (UTC)}}

Revision as of 16:58, 24 February 2008

(Yet another) WQA report

Someone filed a WQA report, which can be found WP:WQA#Complaint against ScienceApologist. Surprised no one has mentioned it to you yet. seicer | talk | contribs 02:03, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

And now WP:AE#Complaint against ScienceApologist. I'm not for sure if the user is canvassing around or if he wasn't satisfied with the original answers from some editors. seicer | talk | contribs 02:37, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Blocked for 96 hours

Blocked for 96 hours for breaking your arbcom civility and AGF restrictions. You only struck the comment after the AN/AE thread was started, so your post on AN/AE mischaracterises your handling of this matter. You clearly did not intend to strike your comment prior to this. Obviously the previous shortened block did not have the desired effect. You are not allowed to be incivil and then recant - the arbcom case requires that you do not be incivil in the first place! John Vandenberg (talk) 03:07, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I noticed this, this morning. Sorry to hear about you being blocked again. As you see from my comments on the Bleep talk page, I think it is hardly worth while staying here. It was interesting learning about the film, but this is so obviously a losing battle. I am going to make the crisps with my son, now, and try and put this short episode behind me. With very best wishes. The Rationalist (talk) 12:48, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ජපස (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please see WP:AE#Complaint against ScienceApologist. There seems to be some misunderstanding that the blocking admin had with regards to the timeline. Please unblock me so that a proper review can be made of the situatiaon at AE. ScienceApologist (talk) 13:31, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your link does not convince me that the blocking admin acted in error was an incivil comment, regardless of whether or not you later retracted it, and under what circumstances. — Sandstein (talk) 16:58, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.