| Revision as of 15:10, 26 February 2008 editSandyGeorgia (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors278,950 edits archive peer review← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:17, 26 February 2008 edit undoSandyGeorgia (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors278,950 edits this is what it should beNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| '''This peer review discussion has been closed.'''<br/> ] | '''This peer review discussion has been closed.'''<br/> ] | ||
Revision as of 15:17, 26 February 2008
Soprano Home Movies
This peer review discussion has been closed.
Hey, I've listed this article about one of my favorite The Sopranos epsiodes for a peer review. I would like some feedback and comments on the overall quality of the article. I've modeled it after the Pilot (House) and Through the Looking Glass (Lost) articles (both featured). Although it's not as long as the latter, I think it covers all important aspects and follows Misplaced Pages:Television episodes closely. The article looked like this before I started working on it. The plot summary is a little longer than what's recommended but I really can't shorten it anymore without losing coherency, and as stated, "do not directly limit summaries if doing so makes them incoherent - the majority of good and featured episode articles overrun this limit slightly." I reckon there's some copy-editing to be made; as English is not my first language, I'm probably not too good at detecting weird and/or silly wordings. I know that the ratings part is just one long sentence but I really think it looks OK like that.
Much appreciated! –FunkyVoltron 17:49, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Category: