| Revision as of 15:15, 26 February 2008 editSandyGeorgia (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors278,958 edits →Soprano Home Movies: add PR← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:49, 26 February 2008 edit undoThedemonhog (talk | contribs)12,045 edits →Soprano Home Movies: OkayNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| '''Self-nomination'''<br>Hey, I've listed this article about one of my favorite ''The Sopranos'' epsiodes as a Featured Article Candidate because I think it qualifies. I modeled it after the ] and ] articles. Although not as long and comprehensive as the latter, (because there simply is more information about ''Lost'' than ''The Sopranos'') I think it covers all important aspects and follows ] closely. The article looked like before I started working on it. The plot summary is a little longer than what's recommended but I really can't shorten it anymore without losing coherency, and as stated, "do not directly limit summaries if doing so makes them incoherent - the majority of good and featured episode articles overrun this limit slightly." I know that the ] part is just one long sentence but I really think it looks OK like that. –] <sup>]</sup> 10:49, 26 February 2008 (UTC) | '''Self-nomination'''<br>Hey, I've listed this article about one of my favorite ''The Sopranos'' epsiodes as a Featured Article Candidate because I think it qualifies. I modeled it after the ] and ] articles. Although not as long and comprehensive as the latter, (because there simply is more information about ''Lost'' than ''The Sopranos'') I think it covers all important aspects and follows ] closely. The article looked like before I started working on it. The plot summary is a little longer than what's recommended but I really can't shorten it anymore without losing coherency, and as stated, "do not directly limit summaries if doing so makes them incoherent - the majority of good and featured episode articles overrun this limit slightly." I know that the ] part is just one long sentence but I really think it looks OK like that. –] <sup>]</sup> 10:49, 26 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :] closed after three days. ] (]) 15:15, 26 February 2008 (UTC) | :] closed after three days. ] (]) 15:15, 26 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::So…? –''']''' <small>''] • ]''</small> 15:49, 26 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:49, 26 February 2008
Soprano Home Movies
Self-nomination
Hey, I've listed this article about one of my favorite The Sopranos epsiodes as a Featured Article Candidate because I think it qualifies. I modeled it after the Pilot (House) and Through the Looking Glass (Lost) articles. Although not as long and comprehensive as the latter, (because there simply is more information about Lost than The Sopranos) I think it covers all important aspects and follows Misplaced Pages:Television episodes closely. The article looked like this before I started working on it. The plot summary is a little longer than what's recommended but I really can't shorten it anymore without losing coherency, and as stated, "do not directly limit summaries if doing so makes them incoherent - the majority of good and featured episode articles overrun this limit slightly." I know that the ratings part is just one long sentence but I really think it looks OK like that. –FunkyVoltron 10:49, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- Peer review closed after three days. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:15, 26 February 2008 (UTC)