Misplaced Pages

User talk:Boothy443/Archive 4: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:Boothy443 Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:10, 24 July 2005 editKaisaL (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators8,860 edits Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Boothy443← Previous edit Revision as of 23:57, 26 July 2005 edit undo198.74.20.118 (talk) babyNext edit →
Line 17: Line 17:


Please see ]. ] 16:10, 24 July 2005 (UTC) Please see ]. ] 16:10, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

== baby ==

Boothy, why are you such a baby?

Revision as of 23:57, 26 July 2005

Sheep vote

Just to let you know that I deleted that sheep vote and told the person who created it that I was incredibly disappointed that he/she created it in the first place. Talrias (t | e | c) 13:25, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

Please be nice

I do not feel that your edit summary, "rv/v by a lemming user, User:Ardonik, if you gonna say it to me then say it to all the admins that seem to be above policy, as long as i am be defamed then this is what you gonna get" was appropriate. User:Ardonik's edit certainly was not vandalism; it was a polite comment left on your talk page. This is what talk pages are for: it is not vandalism to leave people comments on their talk pages. Boothy, are you sure you don't want to discuss the difficulties you've been having on Misplaced Pages? It seems lately all you are interested in is quarrelling with other users. You indicated to me once before that you were willing to discuss your concerns, but you never responded to my reply. I am still available, if you are still interested. — Knowledge Seeker 04:52, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

your votes on RfAs

Hi, I'm just doing the rounds after my successful adminship promotion. But for you I've got something more involved than a cut-n-paste thank-you note. I have not seen an admin nomination yet that you did not oppose, and very few that you did not vote on at all.

I am unclear as to what your motive is by doing this, but it certainly does not make your votes seem to be very important if you do not even express a reason for why no-one meets your expectations.

If you are going to oppose all you see, please have the decency to at least explain your evidently strict criteria to them. Thank you for your time. :) Garrett 11:03, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Boothy443

Please see Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Boothy443. Hedley 16:10, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

baby

Boothy, why are you such a baby?