| Revision as of 02:04, 7 March 2008 editBadagnani (talk | contribs)136,593 edits →Long Xuyen: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:51, 7 March 2008 edit undoToddst1 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors137,716 edits →Long Xuyen: Not meant to be combativeNext edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| Because this is an editor from Vietnam, and presumably they know who is notable and who isn't (and those redlinks, consequently, would lead to articles). If you want to know who the people are, just ask the editor. WP editing shouldn't be a combat. ] (]) 02:04, 7 March 2008 (UTC) | Because this is an editor from Vietnam, and presumably they know who is notable and who isn't (and those redlinks, consequently, would lead to articles). If you want to know who the people are, just ask the editor. WP editing shouldn't be a combat. ] (]) 02:04, 7 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :Not meant to be combative, rather, dealing with vandalism. Specifically, was flagged by Lupin's anti-vandal tool which brought me to the article. After reverting the vandalism, I thought would clean the article up. I'm surprised you're seeing it differently - especially since I said what I was doing, following which policies, in my edit summary. ] (]) 02:51, 7 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:51, 7 March 2008
| This is Toddst1's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
 Archives |
Wow
Kinda harsh on Riverpeopleinvasion, aren't we? Just cuz you don't like the thought of metal up your ass doesn't mean you have to freak out. Most people don't even notice stuff like that. elisa 13:31, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- No I don't think my comment was harsh at all. Nobody freaked out.
- Do you and Riverpeopleinvasion always declare well-earned warnings to each other as "harsh" as he did with this warning you recieved (that appears to have not been taken to heart). Perhaps taking the message seriously would be a better course of action. Toddst1 (talk) 19:33, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- Ha. You're awesome. I love how you dug through my archives to find 'incriminating' evidence. And, if you would have dug a little deeper, those talk edits were because an edit war was occuring and I was trying to resolve the problem (in fact, it's still in progress now). So unless you can come up with a good reason as to why you harrass random people, I suggest you leave me alone. Regards, elisa 20:53, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- You have made two false accusations here: 1) that I freaked out, 2) that I harass people. Please stop. Instead, please take responsibility for your actions. Toddst1 (talk) 23:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
RfA nom page created
Kakofonous would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Kakofonous to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship/Toddst1 . If you accept the nomination, you must formally state and sign your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.Kakofonous (talk) 02:02, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Long Xuyen
Because this is an editor from Vietnam, and presumably they know who is notable and who isn't (and those redlinks, consequently, would lead to articles). If you want to know who the people are, just ask the editor. WP editing shouldn't be a combat. Badagnani (talk) 02:04, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- Not meant to be combative, rather, dealing with vandalism. Specifically, this edit was flagged by Lupin's anti-vandal tool which brought me to the article. After reverting the vandalism, I thought would clean the article up. I'm surprised you're seeing it differently - especially since I said what I was doing, following which policies, in my edit summary. Toddst1 (talk) 02:51, 7 March 2008 (UTC)