Revision as of 15:03, 26 July 2005 editViajero (talk | contribs)11,399 editsm Talk:Isador Feinstein Stone moved to Talk:I. F. Stone← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:32, 26 July 2005 edit undoCberlet (talk | contribs)11,487 edits Could we take one paragraph at a time and discussNext edit → | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
There are some pecularities regarding Stone I would be happy to discuss, in context with the larger edit war that same to be going on. ] 21:04, 23 July 2005 (UTC) | There are some pecularities regarding Stone I would be happy to discuss, in context with the larger edit war that same to be going on. ] 21:04, 23 July 2005 (UTC) | ||
::Could we take one paragraph at a time and discuss the text. Much of the Red-baiting POV and conservative attacks at least need to be cited to a published source so we can discuss them properly.--] 16:32, 26 July 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:32, 26 July 2005
I was under the impression that Izzy's legal name was Isidor Feinstein, which was his birth name, and that I. F. Stone was simply a pen name. On the other hand, it is possible that he legally changed his name to Isidor Feinstein Stone. Perhaps someone more knowledgeable than I am could clear this up, and change the article to reflect the situation Too Old 01:05, 2005 Apr 18 (UTC)
Kalugin
Here is the proper citation FBI Venona FOIA, p. 37, ( under the section entitled "Vladimir S. Pravdin). I know, I know, "Have You No Sense of Decency...". Nobs01 19:41, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
So he published a book about how the U.S. and South Korea "initiated casualties" and "planned for the conflict." OK... now how 'bout we add in the fact that it's now confirmed that the war was started by dear ol' Kim in the North? J. Parker Stone 06:00, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
LOL, didn't even realize that an edit war on this was already in progress... checked this article after seeing Mr. Lopez's references to IF Stone on Magdoff. J. Parker Stone 06:04, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
There are some pecularities regarding Stone I would be happy to discuss, in context with the larger edit war that same to be going on. nobs 21:04, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
- Could we take one paragraph at a time and discuss the text. Much of the Red-baiting POV and conservative attacks at least need to be cited to a published source so we can discuss them properly.--Cberlet 16:32, 26 July 2005 (UTC)