Revision as of 18:08, 8 March 2008 editSGT141 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers13,389 edits Moved last orphaned image bot message to archive← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:36, 16 March 2008 edit undoDynaflow (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers11,919 edits →California sheriff's department moves: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
<center></gallery> | <center></gallery> | ||
<big><center>SGT141. For your efforts in the 3rd WP:LE Forward, I award you your prizes, for completing sections '''A2''', '''A5''' and'''A9''' you receive two one-stripe project awards and one three-stripe award! Thank you for all your hard work, this has been the most successful forward so far. ] <sup>]</sup> 23:32, 27 February 2008 (UTC)</big></center> | <big><center>SGT141. For your efforts in the 3rd WP:LE Forward, I award you your prizes, for completing sections '''A2''', '''A5''' and'''A9''' you receive two one-stripe project awards and one three-stripe award! Thank you for all your hard work, this has been the most successful forward so far. ] <sup>]</sup> 23:32, 27 February 2008 (UTC)</big></center> | ||
== California sheriff's department moves == | |||
Hi. I appreciate the work you've been going on Californian law enforcement agencies. I noticed today, though, that you were moving a lot of sheriff's department articles to new names. Before you move any more articles, has there been a consensus on this kind of renaming at ] or elsewhere? | |||
The reason for my concern is that these renamings are putting the articles at not-entirely-obvious, non-official variations of the actual departments' names without having an apparent need to do so. For example, the name of the San Francisco Sheriff's Department is not "]," nor, to my knowledge, is there any need to disambiguate it from any other San Francisco Sheriff's Department elsewhere. In the cases of the myriad Washington County Sheriff's Departments that are sure to exist across the US, disambiguation and pagemove renaming would be necessary, but in the format showing the incidental state identifier as being parenthetical to the actual, official name, e.g., "Washington County Sheriff's Department (New Somestate)." | |||
Also, "San Francisco, California Sheriff's Department," by strict grammar, implies that "San Francisco" is an additional clause or subset to "California Sheriff's Department," which does not exist. If using that format, the state name would have to be separated out as a parenthetical clause with two commas -- e.g., "San Francisco, California, Sheriff's Department." However, that's not the official name of the department. Better to leave it at its plain name until another article pops up that needs to share the name, and then to just place a further identifier parenthetically at the end of the title, so that the organization's true name isn't broken in the middle (which can hamper certain kinds of searches). ] ] 01:36, 16 March 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:36, 16 March 2008
Archives |
Welcome SGT141
Thank you for joining the Law Enforcement Wikiproject on the English Misplaced Pages! As you would have guessed we are a group dedicated to improving Misplaced Pages's coverage of topics related to law enforcement
Since you now are a member you get to have our userbox or banner on your userpage! To add these use:
{{User WikiprojectPolice}}
-- our userbox, or{{Lawenforcementmember}}
-- our member banner.
Here are some more tips to get you started:
- Creating articles: See here for articles you can create, but don't forget to add ] to the base of the article and our project banner to the talk page of the article using {{WPLE}}
- Participate on our talk page: It is highly recommended that you watchlist it. There are also a number of small projects on the talk page as well that may be of interest to you!
- Check the bulletin board: For news and information, please read the bulletin board regularly or add it to you user-page using:
{{Lawenforcementbulletinboard}}
- Improve an article: Click here to find all the really short articles, pick one from that list and improve it. When you are done go to the talk page of that article and removed {{WPLE| class=Stub}} the bit in bold and another editor will be along to see how well you have done and reassess the article to a much higher class.
All members are reminded:
- That this project aims for: No vandalism, no conflict and if particular articles in this project are suffering from vandalism, edit wars or talk-page abuse, please add it to the Article Watch List
In a nutshell:
- SGGH (Project Coordinator)
- Dep. Garcia ( Talk + | Help Desk | Complaints ) (Assistant Coordinator)
- Or any project coordinator listed on the main project page or members page.
Again, Thank you and Welcome
SGGH 17:40, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
The Third Foward
California sheriff's department moves
Hi. I appreciate the work you've been going on Californian law enforcement agencies. I noticed today, though, that you were moving a lot of sheriff's department articles to new names. Before you move any more articles, has there been a consensus on this kind of renaming at WP:LE or elsewhere?
The reason for my concern is that these renamings are putting the articles at not-entirely-obvious, non-official variations of the actual departments' names without having an apparent need to do so. For example, the name of the San Francisco Sheriff's Department is not "San Francisco, California Sheriff's Department," nor, to my knowledge, is there any need to disambiguate it from any other San Francisco Sheriff's Department elsewhere. In the cases of the myriad Washington County Sheriff's Departments that are sure to exist across the US, disambiguation and pagemove renaming would be necessary, but in the format showing the incidental state identifier as being parenthetical to the actual, official name, e.g., "Washington County Sheriff's Department (New Somestate)."
Also, "San Francisco, California Sheriff's Department," by strict grammar, implies that "San Francisco" is an additional clause or subset to "California Sheriff's Department," which does not exist. If using that format, the state name would have to be separated out as a parenthetical clause with two commas -- e.g., "San Francisco, California, Sheriff's Department." However, that's not the official name of the department. Better to leave it at its plain name until another article pops up that needs to share the name, and then to just place a further identifier parenthetically at the end of the title, so that the organization's true name isn't broken in the middle (which can hamper certain kinds of searches). --Dynaflow babble 01:36, 16 March 2008 (UTC)