Revision as of 16:13, 9 March 2008 editSatyrTN (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users47,258 edits →March 2008: edit warring← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:06, 13 April 2008 edit undoAitias (talk | contribs)Rollbackers50,076 edits Message re. Islamic Golden AgeNext edit → | ||
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
== Edit warring == | == Edit warring == | ||
] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Ayaan Hirsi Ali|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> -- <span style="background: #EECCFF;">] <small>(] / ])</small></span> 16:13, 9 March 2008 (UTC) | ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Ayaan Hirsi Ali|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> -- <span style="background: #EECCFF;">] <small>(] / ])</small></span> 16:13, 9 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
== April 2008 == | |||
] Hi, the <span class="plainlinks"></span> you made to ] has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the ] for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative ]. You may also wish to read the ]. Thanks. <!-- Template:uw-huggle1 --> —] ''•'']''•'' 15:06, 13 April 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:06, 13 April 2008
Welcome
Welcome to Misplaced Pages! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
|
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
March 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did to Ayaan Hirsi Ali. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 15:42, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice. You don't own Wiki to define what constitute Vandalism and what is not based on your needs, is it? I had only included reasoned arguments, if you have any objections, you can discuss about it in the talk page..Reverting quite a lot of revisions without giving any reason constitutes vandalism. Until that time, please consider using sandbox by yourself Zencv (talk) 15:59, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- When you add phrases such as "awards from right-wing groups" without citing a source for your claim, even after you've been asked to cite and still do it, then yeah it's vandalism. AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 16:01, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
This is your own definition..Also see hypocrisy
- Also see WP:3RR and WP:SOCK. AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 16:05, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, I have..What makes you think that I am a Sock? If you have any arguments against what I wrote, you can bring them in talk page instead of looking into my identity. If you think I am a SOCK, either you can live with that or you can consider complaining to admin. Let him decide.
Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ayaan Hirsi Ali. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 16:13, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
April 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Islamic Golden Age has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —αἰτίας •discussion• 15:06, 13 April 2008 (UTC)