Misplaced Pages

:Call a spade a spade: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:22, 10 March 2008 editRaymond arritt (talk | contribs)13,222 edits more reality← Previous edit Revision as of 04:27, 10 March 2008 edit undoRaymond arritt (talk | contribs)13,222 edits cleanup and remove some redundancyNext edit →
Line 10: Line 10:
Although editors who consistently engage in disruptive editing are disruptive editors, and editors who consistently vandalize are vandals, there is still a requirement for editors to be ] to each other. Name-calling and labeling editors is not the appropriate way to handle such situations. If the behavior is problematic, use the ] process. Although editors who consistently engage in disruptive editing are disruptive editors, and editors who consistently vandalize are vandals, there is still a requirement for editors to be ] to each other. Name-calling and labeling editors is not the appropriate way to handle such situations. If the behavior is problematic, use the ] process.
].]] ].]]
Accusations should not be made whether with or without cause, and being blunt is discouraged. Even in cases where you are correct about another user, accusations of POV pushing, tendentious editing, bad editing, and the like, while factually true, may be sufficient grounds for remedial action. Some people will take a detached statement evaluating their work negatively as a personal insult no matter what. Unfailing courtesy, even if insincere, will better help meet your goals. Accusations should not be made whether with or without cause, and being blunt is discouraged. Even in cases where you are correct about another user, accusations of POV pushing, tendentious editing, and the like may be sufficient grounds for remedial action. Unfailing courtesy, even if less than sincere, will better help meet your goals.


==See also== ==See also==

Revision as of 04:27, 10 March 2008

Essay on editing Misplaced Pages
This is an essay.
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Misplaced Pages contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Misplaced Pages's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
Shortcuts
This page in a nutshell: Calling a spade a spade can get you blocked.
"What do you expect of me? I've always been one to call a spade a spade."

"Fine," said Yevgenia. "But don't imagine that's always a virtue."

Vasily Grossman, Life and Fate

Misplaced Pages policies, such as our policy against personal attacks and our policy against incivility, prohibit characterizing an editor as unconstructive regardless of whether the characterization is accurate. The consensus of the community is that such actions are inherently uncivil.

Although editors who consistently engage in disruptive editing are disruptive editors, and editors who consistently vandalize are vandals, there is still a requirement for editors to be civil to each other. Name-calling and labeling editors is not the appropriate way to handle such situations. If the behavior is problematic, use the dispute resolution process.

It's not a "manual geomorphological modification implement", it's just a spade.

Accusations should not be made whether with or without cause, and being blunt is discouraged. Even in cases where you are correct about another user, accusations of POV pushing, tendentious editing, and the like may be sufficient grounds for remedial action. Unfailing courtesy, even if less than sincere, will better help meet your goals.

See also

Categories: