| Revision as of 17:07, 14 March 2008 view sourceSharavanabhava (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers6,327 edits →Appeal of topic ban for User:Whig: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:54, 14 March 2008 view source Lawrence Cohen (talk | contribs)13,393 edits →Appeal of topic ban for User:Whig: reply, good luckNext edit → | ||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
| I have filed a request for arbitration in this matter: ], in which I have named you as a party. You may wish to provide a statement. —] (''']''') 17:07, 14 March 2008 (UTC) | I have filed a request for arbitration in this matter: ], in which I have named you as a party. You may wish to provide a statement. —] (''']''') 17:07, 14 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| : I left a statement. Good luck. <span style="font-variant:small-caps"><font color="#800080">] § ]/]</font></span> 18:54, 14 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:54, 14 March 2008
 | Lawrence Cohen is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Misplaced Pages soon. |
| Welcome to my page! Unless you specifically tell me otherwise, I will respond to you here for any conversations begun by you here. On the same side, if I start a talk with you, I will watch your page for at least a few days after my last message to you to see responses there. |
| This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 31 days are automatically archived. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
| No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful) |
Wiped out my edit
Why did you wipe out my edit? See — Rlevse • Talk • 23:42, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
- Accident, sorry. Lawrence § t/e 23:46, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
- OK, I've seen this happen before with two edits close in time. No problem. — Rlevse • Talk • 23:47, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Mackan79
I entertain the possibility that I goofed. I am hoping that Mackan79 will ok releasing the email and others can review for similarity. His phrasing in the diff in question was very much similar to or identical to other emails Judd sent me, and much stronger than the email, in my judgement, however I think that third party review is appropriate. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 06:19, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- You really should unblock. Your incredibly strong block language in the log if proven wrong will look atrocious for you, degrading others' trust in your ability as an admin, and is now a permanent smear on Mackan79. Lawrence § t/e 06:20, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Boo!
I agree with everything you are saying on Doc's page and elsehwere, but I can't comment, or they will say I'm troling and cause disruption. Just to let you know I'm behind you. Giano (talk) 14:25, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Excessive cross-posting
Hello. You're overdoing it a bit. Why not inform people about it in one central place, like WP:AN, instead of multiple user talk pages. Thanks. El_C 17:28, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry. It's still a draft so I wanted to go with people I've worked with in AC issues before. Lawrence § t/e 17:29, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- I should have emailed... Lawrence § t/e 17:29, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- That's okay; next time: centralize, centralize, centralize! El_C 17:32, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Who is ChipotlePickle?
Added a statement to the Mantanmoreland case, his 7th edit to WP, and made this edit , which makes things look kinda icky. —Preceding unsigned comment added by HappyAnode (talk • contribs) 17:32, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Appeal of topic ban for User:Whig
I have filed a request for arbitration in this matter: Appeal of topic ban for User:Whig, in which I have named you as a party. You may wish to provide a statement. —Whig (talk) 17:07, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- I left a statement. Good luck. Lawrence § t/e 18:54, 14 March 2008 (UTC)