| Revision as of 21:10, 16 March 2008 editDhartung (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers24,482 edits →Georgetown University Student Association: comment← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:22, 16 March 2008 edit undoMichael A. White (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers4,896 edits →Georgetown University Student Association: dNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| :*'''Comment''' Please cite the guideline which states that it is inherently notable simply for existing. --] | ] 21:10, 16 March 2008 (UTC) | :*'''Comment''' Please cite the guideline which states that it is inherently notable simply for existing. --] | ] 21:10, 16 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''': Although much of the article needs to be edited (e.g. the individual students mentioned), the organization satisfies ] because it is mentioned in ] like the ]. These need to be integrated into the article, but it is notable.—<b>] ]</b> 18:06, 16 March 2008 (UTC) | *'''Keep''': Although much of the article needs to be edited (e.g. the individual students mentioned), the organization satisfies ] because it is mentioned in ] like the ]. These need to be integrated into the article, but it is notable.—<b>] ]</b> 18:06, 16 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' - no non-trivial coverage in independent sources.--]<sup>]·]</sup> 21:22, 16 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:22, 16 March 2008
Georgetown University Student Association
- Georgetown University Student Association (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Local student government organization. No WP:Reliable Sources beyond university paper. No assertion of WP:Notability. Merge to main page contested. RedShiftPA (talk) 17:09, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of university deletions. —RedShiftPA (talk) 17:24, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - Inherently notable. Misplaced Pages has no deadline. GreenJoe 18:01, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Please cite the guideline which states that it is inherently notable simply for existing. --Dhartung | Talk 21:10, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
- Keep: Although much of the article needs to be edited (e.g. the individual students mentioned), the organization satisfies WP:ORG because it is mentioned a number of times in reliable sources like the Washington Post. These need to be integrated into the article, but it is notable.—Noetic Sage 18:06, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - no non-trivial coverage in independent sources.--Michael White 21:22, 16 March 2008 (UTC)