| Revision as of 07:57, 23 March 2008 edit92.46.69.162 (talk) →SPAs← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:03, 23 March 2008 edit undoCheeser1 (talk | contribs)7,317 edits →SPAs: wowNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| * It is interesting compare the comments of above mentioned users with the comments some russian users which they did in the first AfD discussion of my article (see please ]). Also these english comments absolutely same with the logic and contents of comments (in russian) which were in Russian.Wiki.(see please ] and ]). Here I would like to present just one and short quotation from their comments " ... Осталось теперь на англвики добить. --RedAndr 15:26, 24 января 2008 (UTC)" main contents of which can be from russian to english translated approximately as " ... our next task is kill (delete) english version of the article" that is my article ]. Also both of these two russian users actively participated in the previous AfD discussions directly and in the second AfD discussion anonymously and using (by) associated users. ] ] (]) 21:12, 22 March 2008 (UTC) | * It is interesting compare the comments of above mentioned users with the comments some russian users which they did in the first AfD discussion of my article (see please ]). Also these english comments absolutely same with the logic and contents of comments (in russian) which were in Russian.Wiki.(see please ] and ]). Here I would like to present just one and short quotation from their comments " ... Осталось теперь на англвики добить. --RedAndr 15:26, 24 января 2008 (UTC)" main contents of which can be from russian to english translated approximately as " ... our next task is kill (delete) english version of the article" that is my article ]. Also both of these two russian users actively participated in the previous AfD discussions directly and in the second AfD discussion anonymously and using (by) associated users. ] ] (]) 21:12, 22 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *:Now ''that'' is inappropriate. Users from one Wiki are ''not'' welcome to flood another in order to influence matters in what is a more-or-less independent project. This kind of tendentious, deliberate, motivated stuff might fly on ru.wiki, but it doesn't here. This certainly explains the fact that so many users have popped up with virtually (or literally) no prior history on en.wiki to vote in uncanny unison to delete this article. I would, at this point, consider this AfD to be spoiled, procedurally, due to the interference of these SPAs, although if one (properly) disregards their contributions, there is a much more productive AfD discussion buried somewhere in here. If I had the time, I'd file an SSP case against all of the editors with little or no prior history on en.wiki who have this otherwise singular opinion - I strongly suspect an abuse of this process going on here. --] (]) 08:03, 23 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:03, 23 March 2008
SPAs
I am alarmed at the number of SPAs that are popping up in this deletion discussion. I am concerned not only by their effect on the discussion but by their uncanny similarity to one another. Does anyone else consider this a problem worth further investigation? --Cheeser1 (talk) 17:07, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Here they are, for the record:
- Antignom (talk · contribs)
- 82.69.100.45 (talk · contribs)
- 129.31.222.133 (talk · contribs)
- Proscience (talk · contribs)
- 76.68.237.72 (talk · contribs)
I'd also point out that the nominator has contributed 75 edits to Misplaced Pages (excluding userspace), and 41 of them (55%) have been to this AfD (or the article in question):
- R Physicist (talk · contribs)
I'm concerned that when you remove the (redundant) rationales of these four SPAs (who I suspect, although assume not, to be some type of puppets), the discussion looks very different, particularly in the makeup and substance of the delete rationales. --Cheeser1 (talk) 18:57, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
- It is interesting compare the comments of above mentioned users with the comments some russian users which they did in the first AfD discussion of my article (see please Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Myrzakulov equations). Also these english comments absolutely same with the logic and contents of comments (in russian) which were in Russian.Wiki.(see please ] and ]). Here I would like to present just one and short quotation from their comments " ... Осталось теперь на англвики добить. --RedAndr 15:26, 24 января 2008 (UTC)" main contents of which can be from russian to english translated approximately as " ... our next task is kill (delete) english version of the article" that is my article Myrzakulov equations. Also both of these two russian users actively participated in the previous AfD discussions directly and in the second AfD discussion anonymously and using (by) associated users. Ngn 92.46.69.162 (talk) 21:12, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
- Now that is inappropriate. Users from one Wiki are not welcome to flood another in order to influence matters in what is a more-or-less independent project. This kind of tendentious, deliberate, motivated stuff might fly on ru.wiki, but it doesn't here. This certainly explains the fact that so many users have popped up with virtually (or literally) no prior history on en.wiki to vote in uncanny unison to delete this article. I would, at this point, consider this AfD to be spoiled, procedurally, due to the interference of these SPAs, although if one (properly) disregards their contributions, there is a much more productive AfD discussion buried somewhere in here. If I had the time, I'd file an SSP case against all of the editors with little or no prior history on en.wiki who have this otherwise singular opinion - I strongly suspect an abuse of this process going on here. --Cheeser1 (talk) 08:03, 23 March 2008 (UTC)