Misplaced Pages

Talk:Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:43, 25 March 2008 editHrafn (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users40,179 edits →Creation Safaris: creationism's lunatic fringe← Previous edit Revision as of 20:51, 2 April 2008 edit undoWesley R. Elsberry (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users507 edits →Peabody AwardNext edit →
Line 11: Line 11:


:It came across as the ranting of a non-notable element of creationism's lunatic fringe to me. Who exactly ''is'' Creation Safaris? I see them occasionally ELed on Creationism articles, but I have never seen them mentioned by reliable sources. <font face="Antiqua, serif">]<sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub></font> 17:43, 25 March 2008 (UTC) :It came across as the ranting of a non-notable element of creationism's lunatic fringe to me. Who exactly ''is'' Creation Safaris? I see them occasionally ELed on Creationism articles, but I have never seen them mentioned by reliable sources. <font face="Antiqua, serif">]<sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub></font> 17:43, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

== Peabody Award ==

The episode won the . That seems like a good thing to add. --] (]) 20:51, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:51, 2 April 2008

WikiProject iconCreationism Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Creationism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Creationism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CreationismWikipedia:WikiProject CreationismTemplate:WikiProject CreationismCreationism
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Response section

I'd like to make a request for a condensation of the response section, given how incredibly outweighed the positive responses to the documentary are by negative ones. I just don't think it needs to be quite that long. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.19.232.115 (talk) 07:55, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

I would tend to agree, the current version gives WP:UNDUE weight to the Creationists's reviews. I would suggest that the Creation Safaris part be reduced to, at most, a single-sentence mention (they really aren't a prominent Creationist group), and that the other Creationist comments be compressed and the Nature review be given more space than a bare mention. HrafnStalk 08:51, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Creation Safaris

I am sorry this section got trimmed back. I think they had such incredible commentary on the documentary.--Filll (talk) 17:30, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

It came across as the ranting of a non-notable element of creationism's lunatic fringe to me. Who exactly is Creation Safaris? I see them occasionally ELed on Creationism articles, but I have never seen them mentioned by reliable sources. HrafnStalk 17:43, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Peabody Award

The episode won the Peabody Award. That seems like a good thing to add. --Wesley R. Elsberry (talk) 20:51, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Categories: