| Revision as of 04:04, 7 September 2002 editSomeone else (talk | contribs)8,055 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:08, 7 September 2002 edit undo-- April (talk | contribs)3,263 edits No reason!Next edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| Is there a reason for using the term Aristolian instead of Aristotelian? ] | Is there a reason for using the term Aristolian instead of Aristotelian? ] | ||
| * Naw, if Aristotelian is the preferred term, by all means change it. ] | |||
Revision as of 04:08, 7 September 2002
Note that I removed references to the idea that abiogenesis (in the modern sense) does not occur in the modern world. For all we know (well, for all I know; biologists may feel free to correct me) abiogenesis occurs constantly, and is generally unobserved because the new proto-life immediately becomes food for existing life. -- April
This still needs lots of work, but I'm increasingly unsure of my ground here. I'll leave this awhile in case a biologist may be tempted to do a better revision, and if not, come back to it after more reading-up on the topic. -- April 04:01 Sep 7, 2002 (UTC)
Is there a reason for using the term Aristolian instead of Aristotelian? Someone else
- Naw, if Aristotelian is the preferred term, by all means change it. -- April