| Revision as of 04:39, 27 March 2008 editRealkyhick (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users42,073 edits →South park animals← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:43, 27 March 2008 edit undoPixelface (talk | contribs)12,801 edits +deletion sorting: Fictional characters, TelevisionNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| *'''Keep''' as acceptable and discrminate spinoff article and subarticle of notable franchise that can easily be verfied. Sincerely, --<font face="Times New Roman">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 03:07, 27 March 2008 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' as acceptable and discrminate spinoff article and subarticle of notable franchise that can easily be verfied. Sincerely, --<font face="Times New Roman">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 03:07, 27 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete,''' original research, fancruft, indiscriminate list. - ] <small>(])</small> 04:39, 27 March 2008 (UTC) | *'''Delete,''' original research, fancruft, indiscriminate list. - ] <small>(])</small> 04:39, 27 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small><small>—] (]) 04:43, 27 March 2008 (UTC)</small> | |||
| *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small><small>—] (]) 04:43, 27 March 2008 (UTC)</small> | |||
Revision as of 04:43, 27 March 2008
South park animals
- South park animals (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
In-universe list for which I can see no use. Was tagged for speedy, but does not meet any of the criteria. J Milburn (talk) 22:13, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Indiscriminate and unsourced information, full of original research ("Kevin may or may not be an animal"), difficult to verify, in-universe... you name it. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • 22:19, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - Fancruft. Blaxthos ( t / c ) 22:29, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- "Cruft" is never a good argument per Misplaced Pages:ITSCRUFT, , and Misplaced Pages:Cruftcruft. Best, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 03:07, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - Original research. Cambrasa (talk) 00:21, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - per above. --Starionwolf (talk) 01:03, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- per votes are generally considered weak. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 03:07, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Keep as acceptable and discrminate spinoff article and subarticle of notable franchise that can easily be verfied. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 03:07, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, original research, fancruft, indiscriminate list. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 04:39, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. —Pixelface (talk) 04:43, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. —Pixelface (talk) 04:43, 27 March 2008 (UTC)