| Revision as of 09:10, 7 September 2002 view sourceWojPob (talk | contribs)2,524 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:10, 7 September 2002 view source WojPob (talk | contribs)2,524 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| Critics of NLP assert that the majority of methods taught as part of NLP have not been scientifically verified. The manner in which NLP has been promoted has also frequently come in for criticism. Practitioners of NLP are sometimes accused of being secretive about techniques and only making them available through expensive courses, making it hard to assess the validity of the techniques. | Critics of NLP assert that the majority of methods taught as part of NLP have not been scientifically verified. The manner in which NLP has been promoted has also frequently come in for criticism. Practitioners of NLP are sometimes accused of being secretive about techniques and only making them available through expensive courses, making it hard to assess the validity of the techniques. | ||
| ''see also: ], the works of ]'' | ''see also: ], the works of ]'' | ||
Revision as of 09:10, 7 September 2002
Neurolinguistic programming, or NLP is the empirical study of, and modelling of, human excellence. It was begun by Richard Bandler and John Grinder in the 1970s. It looks at precisely how we do what we do, and how highly successful individuals do what they do. The purpose is to enable portability and replication of those skills.
Critics of NLP assert that the majority of methods taught as part of NLP have not been scientifically verified. The manner in which NLP has been promoted has also frequently come in for criticism. Practitioners of NLP are sometimes accused of being secretive about techniques and only making them available through expensive courses, making it hard to assess the validity of the techniques.
see also: pseudoscience, the works of Carlos Castaneda