| Revision as of 04:48, 30 March 2008 editHanvanloon (talk | contribs)175 edits →Your contributions← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:52, 30 March 2008 edit undoHanvanloon (talk | contribs)175 edits →Editors and Administrators - trying to solve the Username block issueNext edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| :You are clearly here to promote your work, as shown in your last sentence above, and this is prohibited. Your account is clearly a ], who's sole aim is to represent its editor on the project. Your current editing falls under the username block criteria as you are actively engaging in promoting yourself or another company, especially in the ] article. I provided you with a copy of the deleted article over at ], yet you made no changes, even after I prompted you to change the article when you wanted a reasoning for the deletion. I do not think you are an untrustworthy user and would ask you to reconsider your standing here on wikipedia. At the moment, I am not willing to unblock and IrishGuy & Daniel Case agree above. ]] 18:31, 24 March 2008 (UTC) | :You are clearly here to promote your work, as shown in your last sentence above, and this is prohibited. Your account is clearly a ], who's sole aim is to represent its editor on the project. Your current editing falls under the username block criteria as you are actively engaging in promoting yourself or another company, especially in the ] article. I provided you with a copy of the deleted article over at ], yet you made no changes, even after I prompted you to change the article when you wanted a reasoning for the deletion. I do not think you are an untrustworthy user and would ask you to reconsider your standing here on wikipedia. At the moment, I am not willing to unblock and IrishGuy & Daniel Case agree above. ]] 18:31, 24 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::I am referring to my editing work on Quality management, PDCA, ISO 15504, process capability. I am not trying to edit the page created by Isabel de Pablo. That is for her to edit, not me. Sorry if you misunderstood my meaning.--] (]) 18:50, 28 March 2008 (UTC) | ::I am referring to my editing work on Quality management, PDCA, ISO 15504, process capability. I am not trying to edit the page created by Isabel de Pablo. That is for her to edit, not me. Sorry if you misunderstood my meaning.--] (]) 18:50, 28 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :::To reply further to your comment, I think that editing the content of the page created by Isabel de Pablo would be ], although correcting a spelling mistake (as I did once) would not. I would therefore prefer that Isabel de Pablo is contacted on her talk page and asked to edit her page.--] (]) 04:52, 30 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Your contributions == | == Your contributions == | ||
Revision as of 04:52, 30 March 2008
Username block
- This is often not a reflection on the user, and you are encouraged to choose a new account name which does meet our guidelines and are invited to contribute to Misplaced Pages under an appropriate username. If you feel this block was made in error, you may quickly and easily appeal it - see below.
Our username policy provides guidance on selecting your username. In brief, usernames should not be offensive, disruptive, promotional, related to a 'real-world' group or organization, confusing, or misleading.
If you have already made edits and wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name you may request a change in username which is quick and easy. To do so, please follow these directions:
- Add {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. This is possible because even when you are blocked, you can still edit your own talk page.
- At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
- Please note, you may only request a name that is not already in use. The account is created upon acceptance – do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change since we can far easier allocate your new name to you, if it is not yet used. For more information, please visit Misplaced Pages:Changing username.
Rudget. 11:42, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hanvanloon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Requested username:
sevenberg (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)Decline reason:
Despite the use of the template above for the block, it's apparent the real problem with this user is COI and the username is a subsidiary issue of that. Allowing him to change it won't solve the problem. — Daniel Case (talk) 19:32, 22 March 2008 (UTC)Hanvanloon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
please read text below
Decline reason:
Based on your comments below, you still fail to understand the guidelines for conflict of interest. Please read WP:COI and understand that Misplaced Pages is not a venue for you to promote yourself/your interests. — IrishGuy 01:15, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Editors and Administrators - trying to solve the Username block issue
Rudget has decided with several editors that I am an untrustworthy editor. I believe that there is inconsistent judgment as I have highlighted links to sites that have greater WP:COI concerns that still remain in Misplaced Pages (i.e. the linked pages directly sell/advertise items) to these editors and administrator, whereas my links go to GNU Free document license pages. I would like to propose that editors who are subject matter experts review my edits for the Quality Management, PDCA, Process capability and ISO 15504 pages over the past 3 months. If they believe that the edits have been beneficial in improving the quality of the pages, then please write me a note here. After a period of at least two weeks (and less than a month) to allow for comments, if editors believe my contributions are valuable, then perhaps an administrator may allow me to edit. On the other hand, if no editor believes that my contributions have been beneficial, I politely request that Rudget rollback these pages to the state they were in before I started editing them. This means for example, that the PDCA page will no longer have the Problems with PDCA section (which should please Penfield as this appears to have started his campaign against me), the Quality Management page shall have PDCA as the only quality improvement method, and the ISO 15504 will refer to the superseded TR (Technical Report) form and not the current IS (International Standard). I certainly do not want my work to be represented and misrepresented in Misplaced Pages when my editing rights have been rescinded. --Hanvanloon (talk) 23:29, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
- You are clearly here to promote your work, as shown in your last sentence above, and this is prohibited. Your account is clearly a single purpose account, who's sole aim is to represent its editor on the project. Your current editing falls under the username block criteria as you are actively engaging in promoting yourself or another company, especially in the STARS methodology article. I provided you with a copy of the deleted article over at User:Rudget/STARS methodology, yet you made no changes, even after I prompted you to change the article when you wanted a reasoning for the deletion. I do not think you are an untrustworthy user and would ask you to reconsider your standing here on wikipedia. At the moment, I am not willing to unblock and IrishGuy & Daniel Case agree above. Rudget. 18:31, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- I am referring to my editing work on Quality management, PDCA, ISO 15504, process capability. I am not trying to edit the page created by Isabel de Pablo. That is for her to edit, not me. Sorry if you misunderstood my meaning.--Hanvanloon (talk) 18:50, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
- To reply further to your comment, I think that editing the content of the page created by Isabel de Pablo would be WP:COI, although correcting a spelling mistake (as I did once) would not. I would therefore prefer that Isabel de Pablo is contacted on her talk page and asked to edit her page.--Hanvanloon (talk) 04:52, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- I am referring to my editing work on Quality management, PDCA, ISO 15504, process capability. I am not trying to edit the page created by Isabel de Pablo. That is for her to edit, not me. Sorry if you misunderstood my meaning.--Hanvanloon (talk) 18:50, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Your contributions
I am preparing a report hoping to demonstrate that you have made valuable contributions and that a conflict of interest is minimal and manageable. I think that will help get you unblocked. You could help me prepare that report if you would look through the history of the articles you have contributed to and tell me if any of the IP editors are you when you forgot to login. E.g. Did you make these edits:
Please let me know if you made these or any other edits while you were not logged in. Sbowers3 (talk) 00:41, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
- Hello Sbowers3, First thank you very much for your help. I did the first two edits but not 3 and 4. I also edited ISO 15504 page quite some time ago without logging in, that is before I knew this was the preferred method. They should all be the same IP address in Switzerland. --Hanvanloon (talk) 04:48, 30 March 2008 (UTC)