| Revision as of 18:37, 3 August 2005 editTexture (talk | contribs)19,623 edits Upon review, the result of the debate was clearly '''Delete'''← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:46, 17 August 2005 edit undoTony Sidaway (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers81,722 editsm Reverted edits by Texture to last version by Tony SidawayNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| The result of the debate was '''no consensus'''. --]] 04:02, 3 August 2005 (UTC) | The result of the debate was '''no consensus'''. --]] 04:02, 3 August 2005 (UTC) | ||
| Upon review, the result of the debate was clearly '''Delete''' with many requesting transwiki. Transwiki has been performed and article is deleted. - ]]] 18:37, 3 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
Revision as of 23:46, 17 August 2005
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus. --Tony Sidaway 04:02, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Savoir-faire
This is a great idea, but I think it belongs on Wikibooks, not Misplaced Pages. Can it be moved over? I proposed this by tagging the article as such, but this was reverted without comment by the page's creator, and I thought I should ask the broader community. -- Beland 03:03, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
- Transwiki and Delete. Someone is welcome to create a Guide to Roughing It or How to Rebuild Civilization After George Bush is Done With It Wikibook. WP:WIN a how-to guide. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 18:57, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
- Transwiki and Delete. Brilliant concept, but not here. Should make a fine Wikibook though. :) Garrett 22:59, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Interesting portal. What harm is it actually doing? Grace Note 04:04, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
- None, but we are supposed to "stick to our guns" as far as upholding our established rules are concerned, even if, as you say, there's no harm in it. We can't go making exceptions or they might set a precedent. Garrett 12:17, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
- Please note the existence of both Wikibooks:Transwiki:Savoir-faire and Wikibooks:how-tos bookshelf. Uncle G 11:13, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as redundant with Wikibooks. Radiant_>|< 12:08, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per Radiant!. Dcarrano 13:46, July 20, 2005
- Delete. Binadot 02:14, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
- Both The discriptive element (ie, what saive-faire is) should be kept, and the instuctional (how to) elements should be moved to Wikibooks. 203.79.121.31 07:42, 22 July 2005 (UTC).
- Don't know what to do This does not really belog on Wikibooks at all. This isn't a textbook at all, and is the sort of thing that at Wikibooks we are trying to get rid of ourselves (I primarily hang out at Wikibooks). Yes, there are "How to" books at Wikibooks, but I don't want to see Wikibooks be the dumping ground for unwanted content from Misplaced Pages. In short, if you want to delete it, kill it outright, and don't transwiki. If they want to create a new project, ask for advise on meta at Proposals for new projects --Robert Horning 08:38, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.