Misplaced Pages

User talk:Jsn9333: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:49, 30 March 2008 editAuburnPilot (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users27,289 edits User notice: 3rr← Previous edit Revision as of 16:07, 30 March 2008 edit undoJsn9333 (talk | contribs)601 edits Regarding reversions made on March 30 2008 to Fox News ChannelNext edit →
Line 11: Line 11:
==Regarding reversions made on ] ] to ]== ==Regarding reversions made on ] ] to ]==
] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> - ] ] 15:49, 30 March 2008 (UTC) ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> - ] ] 15:49, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

:: I have discussed all my changes on in the POV section of the Fox News entry's talk page. I am open to more discussion, but the other party has stopped discussing. If discussion with the other party seeking to bias the entry does not solve the problem then we'll have to turn to another request for comment or a survey (most likely even arbitration since supposedly a consensus was already built around the biased treatment of the opening section of the entry).

Revision as of 16:07, 30 March 2008

Welcome!

Hello, Jsn9333, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Neo-Jay (talk) 15:13, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Regarding reversions made on March 30 2008 to Fox News Channel

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. - auburnpilot talk 15:49, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

I have discussed all my changes on in the POV section of the Fox News entry's talk page. I am open to more discussion, but the other party has stopped discussing. If discussion with the other party seeking to bias the entry does not solve the problem then we'll have to turn to another request for comment or a survey (most likely even arbitration since supposedly a consensus was already built around the biased treatment of the opening section of the entry).