| Revision as of 16:47, 31 March 2008 editRyan Postlethwaite (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users28,432 edits →going to block me?: blocked← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:00, 31 March 2008 edit undoNick (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators22,287 edits commentNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{sockpuppet|Davenbelle|confirmed}} | |||
| {{email user}} | |||
| <div style="position: relative; top: 0px; left: 0px;"> | |||
| <div style="position: absolute; right: -5px; top: -9px; display: block;"> | |||
| <div style="width: auto; background-color: #fafafa; margin-top: 3px; border: 1px solid #976684; padding: 0px;"> | |||
| <div style="margin: 0 6px;"> | |||
| <p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1px;"> | |||
| ''Thanks to all who defend this page against vandals'' | |||
| </p> | |||
| </div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| {| cellpadding="10" cellspacing="8" style="width: 100%; background-color: #e8dae7; border: 1px solid #976684; vertical-align: top;" | |||
| | style="width: 69%; background-color: #fff4fa; border: 1px solid #976684; border-right-width: 2px; border-bottom-width: 2px; vertical-align: top;" rowspan="2" | | |||
| * ] | |||
| == Discussion at WP:AN == | |||
| Just a note to let you know that I've started a discussion concerning your editing patterns at ] - your input and insights would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance. ] (]) 03:17, 29 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Discussion at WT:FICT == | |||
| Have you been following the discussion at ]? Am I going mad or what? There seems to be a move to water down ] to allow "Aggregate" and "Spin Off" articles in which ] and ] are permissible. Once the flood gates are open, I believe there will be no end to the creation of articles about non-notable fictional characters. What a disaster! --] (]) 00:06, 31 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| : ya, but have not been over there in a few weeks; a ], for sure. The operative word in the argument is that this is ''necessary''… and I question it; necessary for what? other than obsessive fandom. My view is that not enough people understand scalability issues. Look at the D&D stuff; some there wiki-link every noun with the full intent of an article for them all. Misplaced Pages has become fantastically popular with too many people that fit the current box at the top of my user page. Got $20? Go get yourself a copy of ] and give it an attentive listen. Pick up ], too. Cheers, ] 13:43, 31 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::I was about to post this on the talk page mentioned above, but figured it would be more appropriate here (and more off topic there). If you haven't read it already, try to locate a copy of ]'s '']'' and/or ''The Other Glass Teat'' for similar commentary. (And, yes, obviously that article has it's own issues too. :) Ciao ] | ] | 14:55, 31 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Might be tough to find for me; I take a 737 to get to the book store. I have read Ellison. You might also read ] which lays a lot of blame on television. Cheers, ] 15:03, 31 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Nice picture - it really helps the article. :) I don't subscribe to the "obligatory picture" argument, but they can certainly help. - ] (]) 13:16, 31 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Davenbelle et al == | == Davenbelle et al == | ||
| Line 40: | Line 10: | ||
| To anyone here to block me, I would like to state that I will be very, very good if you do not. I would like to be able to participate in discussions. Cheers, ] 15:54, 31 March 2008 (UTC) | To anyone here to block me, I would like to state that I will be very, very good if you do not. I would like to be able to participate in discussions. Cheers, ] 15:54, 31 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :I'm sorry Jack, but I've blocked your account. There's not much else to really discuss with this as you're a banned editor who isn't allowed to edit with any account. ] 16:47, 31 March 2008 (UTC) | :I'm sorry Jack, but I've blocked your account. There's not much else to really discuss with this as you're a banned editor who isn't allowed to edit with any account. ] 16:47, 31 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :If you wish to discuss the terms of your block, please contact the Arbitration Committee in private. Thanks. ] (]) 17:00, 31 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:00, 31 March 2008
 | This account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of Davenbelle (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely. Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |  |
Davenbelle et al
For the record, I'll now admit that I was user User:Davenbelle, User:Moby Dick, User:Diyarbakir and User:Note to Cool Cat. I have informed the WP:AC and several others of this. I sincerely apologize to friends for having concealed this. Cheers, Jack Merridew 15:18, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
going to block me?
To anyone here to block me, I would like to state that I will be very, very good if you do not. I would like to be able to participate in discussions. Cheers, Jack Merridew 15:54, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
- I'm sorry Jack, but I've blocked your account. There's not much else to really discuss with this as you're a banned editor who isn't allowed to edit with any account. Ryan Postlethwaite 16:47, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
- If you wish to discuss the terms of your block, please contact the Arbitration Committee in private. Thanks. Nick (talk) 17:00, 31 March 2008 (UTC)