Misplaced Pages

User talk:Jack Merridew: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:08, 31 March 2008 editFran Rogers (talk | contribs)8,995 edits →Davenbelle et al: declined← Previous edit Revision as of 17:25, 31 March 2008 edit undoJack Merridew (talk | contribs)34,837 edits →Davenbelle et alNext edit →
Line 18: Line 18:


{{unblock reviewed|1=I would like to be allowed to participate in discussions and to edit my userspace; specifically ]. If anyone is willing to unblock me, I will agree to whatever editing limitations are set. It's 1:am here, so I won't be looking to edit for better than 12 hours anyway. Please discuss on your side of the world. and let me know. I'll also answer emails. Per Nick's comment, this unblock request, is really to any AC member. Cheers, ] 17:04, 31 March 2008 (UTC)|decline=I see no pressing reason for you to be able to edit project or user space at this time. You're blocked; ArbCom is the only avenue for you to appeal at this time. — '''<font color="#ff9900">]</font><font color="#ff6699">]</font>''' 17:08, 31 March 2008 (UTC)}} {{unblock reviewed|1=I would like to be allowed to participate in discussions and to edit my userspace; specifically ]. If anyone is willing to unblock me, I will agree to whatever editing limitations are set. It's 1:am here, so I won't be looking to edit for better than 12 hours anyway. Please discuss on your side of the world. and let me know. I'll also answer emails. Per Nick's comment, this unblock request, is really to any AC member. Cheers, ] 17:04, 31 March 2008 (UTC)|decline=I see no pressing reason for you to be able to edit project or user space at this time. You're blocked; ArbCom is the only avenue for you to appeal at this time. — '''<font color="#ff9900">]</font><font color="#ff6699">]</font>''' 17:08, 31 March 2008 (UTC)}}

Thanks. I've just answered my various emails. Cheers, ] 17:25, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:25, 31 March 2008

Multi-user iconThis account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of Davenbelle (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.
Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth		A CheckUser has confirmed that this account is a sockpuppet


Davenbelle et al

For the record, I'll now admit that I was user User:Davenbelle, User:Moby Dick, User:Diyarbakir and User:Note to Cool Cat. I have informed the WP:AC and several others of this. I sincerely apologize to friends for having concealed this. Cheers, Jack Merridew 15:18, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

going to block me?

To anyone here to block me, I would like to state that I will be very, very good if you do not. I would like to be able to participate in discussions. Cheers, Jack Merridew 15:54, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry Jack, but I've blocked your account. There's not much else to really discuss with this as you're a banned editor who isn't allowed to edit with any account. Ryan Postlethwaite 16:47, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
No offense, this is expected. There are discussions afoot and I would like to participate. FYI, only one arb commented to the effect that I'm banned , not a formal ruling. Immaterial, I know. Cheers, Jack Merridew 17:04, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
If you wish to discuss the terms of your block, please contact the Arbitration Committee in private. Thanks. Nick (talk) 17:00, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
I have contacted them, really. Specifically User:Newyorkbrad. Cheers, Jack Merridew 17:04, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jack Merridew (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to be allowed to participate in discussions and to edit my userspace; specifically User:Jack Merridew/Allison Sudradjat. If anyone is willing to unblock me, I will agree to whatever editing limitations are set. It's 1:am here, so I won't be looking to edit for better than 12 hours anyway. Please discuss on your side of the world. and let me know. I'll also answer emails. Per Nick's comment, this unblock request, is really to any AC member. Cheers, Jack Merridew 17:04, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I see no pressing reason for you to be able to edit project or user space at this time. You're blocked; ArbCom is the only avenue for you to appeal at this time. — krimpet✽ 17:08, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thanks. I've just answered my various emails. Cheers, Jack Merridew 17:25, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Category: