Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 17:56, 31 March 2008

No way!

Apropos the changes you made to the artilce ]-You think Wiki is the space to dump your ideoloical baggage? Your ilk have been warned earlier about the policy of Wiki. Why don't you see sense? Put all those things in your party organs, not here! Kuntan 15:58, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

You can't remove dispute tags without giving proper reason. You are spoiling the article. You simply can't enforce your party's decision about a Misplaced Pages article. Pity that you don't see sense and desist. You are from Kerala, I suppose? Kuntan 09:11, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Shibdas Ghosh

Please don't create and recreate an article without content. If this person is noteworthy, write an article with content that explains why. Thanks, NawlinWiki 17:32, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

If "more details will be added later", wait to create the article until you have the details. There is no point having an article without content. NawlinWiki 17:34, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Please note that you can sign your comments by putting ~ 4 times and that you can look at the preview before saving. Clt13 11:45, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

truths

Certain truths you can verify without visiting websites, say like the case of notorious sodomite leaders.Kuntan 17:54, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

No meaningless reverts please

Your editing manners are improper. Why do you revert changes without giving reason? You have been observed removing tags at your will and have been warned several times. Since your edits have left the articled mangled and poorer, you are harming your own cause. Kuntan 18:16, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Your Immediate leader

Hey friend, Why don't you write new articles instead of mangling the existing ones, say on C.K. Lukose? Kuntan 12:33, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Autobiography

Please see the guidline WP:AUTO, in case you represent SUCI

What do you want us to do with the Auto Biography? We know how to write about our leader and we dont think that anything that is presently there about Com. Shibdas Ghosh in the relevant page has anything un-wanted according to the Wiki guidelines.--Suciindia 14:03, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

I just want you to read WP:AUTO.--Clt13 03:24, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi comrade, I am from RSA

Hi comrade, I am a communist and anarchist from South Africa. found the article about your party and your leader and thought theme very interesting. I would like to know a bit more about your party. Some points mentioned in the article currently and some I gleaned from going back in the history attracted me, especially those like your commune and attitude towards private property etc. I went through several of your leader's pamphlets and think highly of them. Has he enlarged on those topics elsewhere? From what I have read, I understand that your party sets great store by high moral values. I would like to know what processes and mecahanism in your party ensure moral standards. Has your party scuceeded in doing away with the private property within your organisational community? I am keenly interested to know. Please give me as much details as possible. If you can let me know your email address or postal address I would like to contact you. comradely yours, Nguvon

Dear Mr. Nguvon, You may kindly contact suci_cc@vsnl.net. Alternatively, you can check www.suci.in for details about our party and its activities.

Regards --Suciindia 08:01, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Red salute comrade Dear com, i see ur message. good that ur working on it. but we want to give more details on our party here. what you think?. i am inviting other cmorads also to do edit. there is some anti party people working hard to destroy our party. so take care. east bangla party comrads will also write articles and we give link here to there and there to here. revoluionry greetins. khudiram

Dear Comrade, Please discuss with the CC office through suci_cc@vsnl.net. If instructed from CC office please feel free to edit the text.

Regards --Suciindia 08:03, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Your improper edits

Since you are bent on spoiling the contents of Socialist Unity Centre of India in accordance with your party line it looks like it is time it went through arbitration process. Kundan After Sundown 20:23, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Happy First Day of Spring!

Just wishing you a wonderful First Day of Spring {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}! ~~~~

aidyo

hi,

could you have a look at the All India Democratic Youth Organisation article? Its currently very short, and a merge is proposed. --Soman (talk) 20:23, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Dear Soman, Sure, please do so. Eventually when we have time to add some more content, we will do so.--Suciindia (talk) 15:35, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

3rr

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

read

you'd better read —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.91.253.11 (talk) 19:02, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

comment

hi. thank you for your comment. however, i have to inform that collective editing accounts are not encouraged at wikipedia. there is also a problem of WP:COI. Although I appreciate the openess of your approach, it would probably be better to construct individual editing accounts. --Soman (talk) 12:39, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

References

Hi. Sorry for delaying my response. References can be from non-english sources, although english sources are clearly preferred. If you use non-english or non-internet sources, please be ready to provide quotations from the original in case there is a dispute over the accuracy of the reference. --Soman (talk) 07:12, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

future personification of the collective knowledge (science of all sciences)

you? poor boy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.91.253.113 (talk) 13:56, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Bravo, son of the secretary. Your commie spirit is unflagging. I beat a retreat. 59.91.253.113 (talk) 14:08, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008

Hi, Suciindia, thanks for getting in touch so quickly. Can you point me to where this incident has been reported? I've had a (quick) look on , and , and I've searched using - nothing's turned up, but Misplaced Pages is a big place :-)

Many thanks,  This flag once was red  21:57, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

My apologies, Suciindia, I've found it: . Good to see this is being dealt with. I've removed the 3RR warning from this page.

Best wishes,  This flag once was red  22:30, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Block Review

Good afternoon. Your block is the subject of discussion at the Administrator's Noticeboard for Incidents, where the suggestion was made to point out several of our key policies, including the policy on the use of multiple accounts, the policy on "gaming the system", and the requirements for Reliable Sources. There seems to be support for an unblock of your account if you would review and acknowledge your intent to abide by these policies in your further edits to the encyclopedia. Even if blocked, you are able to edit this talk page, and I would invite you to do so should you have any questions on these policies, the discussion at WP:ANI, or your status in general. UltraExactZZ ~ Evidence 17:50, 31 March 2008 (UTC)