Misplaced Pages

Talk:Supernatural Role Playing Game: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:39, 6 April 2008 editCraw-daddy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers13,951 edits update template← Previous edit Revision as of 01:52, 1 January 2014 edit undoNeonchameleon (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,760 edits Upgraded page to start qualityNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{RPGproject|class=stub|importance=low}} {{RPGproject|class=start|importance=low}}
{{talkheader}} {{talkheader}}


Revision as of 01:52, 1 January 2014

WikiProject iconRole-playing games Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of role-playing games on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Supernatural Role Playing Game article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Sourcing?

How does one go about sourcing a conversation I had with the guys running the very first Supernatural RPG games? Web Warlock 12:37, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

It's probably going to be pretty hard to do that. See the No Original Research policy. There has to be a way to verify it in an Neutral Point of View manner, for conversations (other than published interviews) this is very hard to do. --Wynler | Talk 17:14, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Yet the information in the conversation is no less valid. I might be months before the same information comes out in a verifible form; ie when the game comes out. So keep that in mind when working on this article, the information needed does exsist, it is just not on the web yet. Web Warlock 17:27, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Yup. It's one of the aggravating things, having to wait to put down somethings. For the most part, It's not going to bother me adding/editing some things but you might have problems with some of the other editors. (Since I can IM some guys at MWP, I can check information, but even this isn't verfication by WP standards.) If you do have something like a letter or an email, I know there are channels to have it accepted as a reference. But I'm not sure what those are. --Wynler | Talk 21:25, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Ah fun stuff. OF COurse I see the problem with this too. So the guy that ran all of MWP games at GenCon lives near me. I can call him and say "put this in an email to me" then use that email as my "proof". I think I'll just wait till some other sources pick it up. So for notability and research, yeah it is coming and it is there, just not in "print" yet. Web Warlock 02:41, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Categories: