| Revision as of 19:26, 8 April 2008 editJaakobou (talk | contribs)15,880 edits starting it | Revision as of 08:32, 9 April 2008 edit undoJaakobou (talk | contribs)15,880 edits →What's going on?Next edit → | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| ==== What's going on? ==== | ==== What's going on? ==== | ||
| * Current conflicting versions can be seen here: . | * Current conflicting versions can be seen here: . | ||
| Version supported by Jaakobou has been built up from a small criticism compromize achived in September 2006. In September 2007 an editor insisted the event was not notable and ever since there'd been discussions and further source inspection leading to a larger and heavily sourced version. Frankly, after 7 months of being forced to inspect each and every source and prove (to my recollection) 14 high quality sources considered this event serious, I'm not willing to go back to the mini-version I've agreed to back in 2006; certainly not after I've repeatedly suggested this compromise before being forced to do much work. In any event, Nickhh version is inappropriate being that it's (a) untrue to the sources found, and (b) uses no sources at all for the biggest controversy. <b><font face="Arial" color="teal">]</font><font color="1F860E"><sup>'']''</sup></font></b> 19:26, 8 April 2008 (UTC) | Version supported by Jaakobou has been built up from a small criticism compromize achived in September 2006. In September 2007 an editor insisted the event was not notable and ever since there'd been discussions and further source inspection leading to a larger and heavily sourced version. Frankly, after 7 months of being forced to inspect each and every source and prove (to my recollection) 14 high quality sources considered this event serious, I'm not willing to go back to the mini-version I've agreed to back in 2006; certainly not after I've repeatedly suggested this compromise before (and during) being forced to do much work. In any event, Nickhh version is inappropriate being that it's (a) untrue to the sources found, and (b) uses no sources at all for the biggest controversy. <b><font face="Arial" color="teal">]</font><font color="1F860E"><sup>'']''</sup></font></b> 19:26, 8 April 2008 (UTC) minor clarification 08:32, 9 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ==== What would you like to change about that? ==== | ==== What would you like to change about that? ==== | ||
Revision as of 08:32, 9 April 2008
| Misplaced Pages Mediation Cabal | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Article | Saeb Erekat |
| Status | new |
| Request date | Unknown |
| Requesting party | Unknown |
| Parties involved | Jaakobou, Nickhh |
Request details
There is a long going dispute over the "controversy" section in the article. After 7 months of discussions it's clear that some form of official/semi-official mediation is needed.
Current conflicting versions can be seen here: .
Who are the involved parties?
What's going on?
Version supported by Jaakobou has been built up from a small criticism compromize achived in September 2006. In September 2007 an editor insisted the event was not notable and ever since there'd been discussions and further source inspection leading to a larger and heavily sourced version. Frankly, after 7 months of being forced to inspect each and every source and prove (to my recollection) 14 high quality sources considered this event serious, I'm not willing to go back to the mini-version I've agreed to back in 2006; certainly not after I've repeatedly suggested this compromise before (and during) being forced to do much work. In any event, Nickhh version is inappropriate being that it's (a) untrue to the sources found, and (b) uses no sources at all for the biggest controversy. Jaakobou 19:26, 8 April 2008 (UTC) minor clarification 08:32, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
What would you like to change about that?
- Go back to the well cited encyclopedic version. Jaakobou 19:26, 8 April 2008 (UTC)