Misplaced Pages

:Arbitration/Requests: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:23, 10 April 2008 view sourceArcticocean (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators46,395 edits tweak← Previous edit Revision as of 11:22, 10 April 2008 view source Daniel (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators75,729 edits Egyptians: Reject, 0/5/0/0, no comments in the last 72 hours.Next edit →
Line 50: Line 50:
---- ----


=== Egyptians ===
'''Initiated by ''' ] '''at''' 07:30, 6 April 2008 (UTC)


==== Involved parties ====
<!-- use {{admin|username}} if the party is an administrator -->
*{{userlinks|Funkynusayri}}, ''filing party''
*{{userlinks|Zerida}}
<!-- The editor filing the case should be included as a party for purposes of notifications. -->


;Confirmation that all parties are aware of the reques
<!-- All parties must be notified that the request has been filed, immediately after it is posted, and confirmation posted here. -->
*I'm aware. ] (]) 09:37, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
*Zerida was not notified as required but has commented here, rendering any late notification moot. ] (]) 01:42, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

;Confirmation that other steps in ] have been tried
<!-- Identify prior attempts at dispute resolution here, with links/diffs to the page where the resolution took place. If prior dispute resolution has not been attempted, the reasons for this should be explained in the request for arbitration -->
*]
*]

==== Statement by ] ====
The premise of the ] article is that modern day citizens of the ] consitute an ethnic group on their own rather than simply a nationality, and that all Egyptians consider themselves "ethnic Egyptians", and not as Arabs. This is incorrect, controversial, and POV, but the main editors of the article, who tend to remove critical comments on the talk page of the article, base their view on one single source, a CIA site which states that 94% of Egyptian citizens are Egyptians by ethnicity.

Also, the Arab World Wiki Project tag is repeatedly removed from the talk page, in spite of the obivous fact that Egyptians are a part of the Arab world.

So the two main problems are: Modern day Egyptians do not exist as a distinct ethnic group today, but are presented as such in the article, and it is completely denied that any Egyptians could identify as Arabs, or that there are even Arabs in Egypt, other than a handful Bedouins. I have presented this problem to an admin once, FayssalF, but with no further answers.

See above links for arguments. ] (]) 07:37, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
:That is an unrelated page/incident (on the ] page). This is about the ] page. ] (]) 21:15, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

==== Statement by Zerida ====

. — ] ] 18:30, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

==== Statement by slightly involved admin ] ====
I am involved in this insofar as I closed a 3RR report and warned Funkynusayri about edit warring. I would urge rejection by ArbCom due to failure to pursue prior steps of dispute resolution. ] (]) 20:43, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

==== Clerk notes ====
:''This area is used for notes by non-recused Clerks.''

==== Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter (0/5/0/0) ====
* Reject, premature content dispute; please make use of the preliminary methods of dispute resolution instead of bringing this here. ] 01:40, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
* Decline at this time, as I agree that other means of dispute resolution have not been exhausted. Please note that this doesn't mean we don't think there is a dispute that needs to be resolved&mdash;simply that an arbitration case is not the necessary way to resolve them. ] (]) 04:03, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
* Reject. Arbitration is the last step in the ] process, and further arbitration is not a method for resolving content disputes. I would recommend seeking the input of more editors, perhaps via a ]. --]&nbsp;(]) 08:44, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
* Reject, per above comments. ]] 10:35, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
* Reject per all the above. -- ] - <small>]</small> 15:07, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

----
==<span id="REQ" />Clarifications and other requests== ==<span id="REQ" />Clarifications and other requests==
''For clarifications and motions in prior cases, please see ''']'''.'' ''For clarifications and motions in prior cases, please see ''']'''.''

Revision as of 11:22, 10 April 2008

Weighing scales Arbitration​Committee
Dispute resolution
(Requests)
Tips
Content disputes
Conduct disputes
Misplaced Pages Arbitration
Open proceedings
Active sanctions
Arbitration Committee
Audit
Track related changes
Shortcuts

A request for arbitration is the last step of dispute resolution for conduct disputes on Misplaced Pages. The Arbitration Committee considers requests to open new cases and review previous decisions. The entire process is governed by the arbitration policy. For information about requesting arbitration, and how cases are accepted and dealt with, please see guide to arbitration.

To request enforcement of previous Arbitration decisions or discretionary sanctions, please do not open a new Arbitration case. Instead, please submit your request to /Requests/Enforcement.

This page transcludes from /Case, /Clarification and Amendment, /Motions, and /Enforcement.

Please make your request in the appropriate section:

Arbitration Committee proceedings Case requests

Currently, there are no requests for arbitration.

Open cases
Case name Links Evidence due Prop. Dec. due
Palestine-Israel articles 5 (t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t) 21 Dec 2024 11 Jan 2025
Recently closed cases (Past cases)

No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).

Clarification and Amendment requests
Request name Motions  Case Posted
Amendment request: American politics 2 none (orig. case) 15 January 2025
Arbitrator motions

No arbitrator motions are currently open.


Current requests

Appeal of commuity ban of Iantresman

Initiated by Stifle (talk) at 10:07, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Involved parties

Confirmation that all parties are aware of the reques
  • Notified Iantresman here
  • I will soon leave talk page messages for other users who participated in the CSN discussion. They can then drop by here and add themselves if they wish.
  • Messages left in the following diffs: Stifle (talk) 10:14, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried
  • Not applicable as the matter is an appeal of a community ban. There was no RFC or other prior dispute resolution before the matter was landed at WP:CSN.

Statement by User:Stifle

At the Community Sanction Noticeboard around nine months ago, User:Iantresman was banned with just over 5 hours' discussion. He has indicated a desire to appeal this ban and I am opening it here on his behalf. I feel that while Iantresman was disruptive at the time, the punishment was excessive and the ban should be reduced to time served, perhaps with probation or an editing supervision. Stifle (talk) 10:07, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Statement by User:Iantresman

As Iantresman is indefinitely blocked he cannot make a statement here. I have asked him to place his statement on his talk page and a clerk or other user should transfer it here when entered.

Clerk notes

This area is used for notes by non-recused Clerks.

Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter (0/0/0/0)



Clarifications and other requests

For clarifications and motions in prior cases, please see Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Clarifications and motions.

Categories:
Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests: Difference between revisions Add topic