| Revision as of 23:46, 11 April 2008 editCoppertwig (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers17,236 edits →3RR: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:27, 13 April 2008 edit undoLarklight (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,814 edits Unhelpful editsNext edit → | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
| Hello, J.R. Hercules. I'm a non-admin helper at the 3RR noticeboard. I believe you've stepped beyond the limits of the ] at ]. Although you've been a Wikipedian for quite some time, I'm not sure whether you were aware of this rule. If you're quick, you can still re-revert your last change back to the way it was before you changed it, putting yourself back within the limits of the rule. If someone else reverts your edit first, you lose that opportunity, and you might be blocked from editing for a period of time. See the 3RR report at ]. <font color="#BB7730" size="5pt">☺</font>] (]) 23:46, 11 April 2008 (UTC) | Hello, J.R. Hercules. I'm a non-admin helper at the 3RR noticeboard. I believe you've stepped beyond the limits of the ] at ]. Although you've been a Wikipedian for quite some time, I'm not sure whether you were aware of this rule. If you're quick, you can still re-revert your last change back to the way it was before you changed it, putting yourself back within the limits of the rule. If someone else reverts your edit first, you lose that opportunity, and you might be blocked from editing for a period of time. See the 3RR report at ]. <font color="#BB7730" size="5pt">☺</font>] (]) 23:46, 11 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == Unhelpful edits == | |||
| Hello. You've recently made a series of edits on economics articles. Some of these edits do not confirm to NPOV guidlines, and some involve the blanking of unsoruced matereal without instead requesting citations. Please avoid doing these again: especially deleting the same line a second time on a different page after references had been added for it on the first. Thankyou, ] (]) 20:27, 13 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:27, 13 April 2008
J.R. Hercules, here. Leave message below:
R.E.M
I assure you it's not some sort of power trip. The reason I keep deleting that one sentence is because it's relatively unimportant and the reference you used (which is a bio on a music festival site) is simply not acceptable. WesleyDodds 00:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
John Lennon
If you could leave a reference about why Lennon did not lose his MBE status after returning it, it would be good. Otherwise, it could be regarded as POV. --andreasegde (talk) 01:50, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Madonna (entertainer)
Please avoid personal and homophobic comments per Misplaced Pages:No personal attacks. There is no need to call attention to self apparent idiocy, as that is redundant. Remove content when necessary and describe why in an objective manner. In this instance you could have removed the claims because they where uncited and unverifiable, which is a much stronger argument. See also: User talk:J.R. Hercules/Archive#Please acquaint (or reacquaint) yourself with Misplaced Pages policies. Hyacinth (talk) 19:05, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
- Do you know Misplaced Pages's policy of neutrality? Saying that "Madonna has gained some notablility as.." is Biased Point of View. Please stop writing such things Vikrant 16:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vikrant Phadkay (talk • contribs)
Hello
- I noticed your work on the Dostoevsky article. Fantastic. I was wondering if you have this book.
- An Intellectual Tradition: Dostoyevsky and Alex Solzhenitsyn In an elaborately researched monograph, Russian scholar and political philosopher, Nicholas Rzhevsky, unequivocally confirms that Dostoyevsky created a unique religious synthesis and conservative intellectual tradition in late nineteenth-century Russian history (Cf. his Russian Literature and Ideology: Herzen,Dostoyevsky, Leontiev, Tolstoy , Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press, 1983)
and
- Solzhenitsyn and Dostoevsky A study in the Polyphonic Novel by Vladislav Krasnov ISBN 0-8203-0472-7
- If you have how do you see that it's content might be better incorporated into the Dostoevsky article? LoveMonkey (talk) 17:40, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
3RR
Hello, J.R. Hercules. I'm a non-admin helper at the 3RR noticeboard. I believe you've stepped beyond the limits of the three-revert rule at Opposition to trade unions. Although you've been a Wikipedian for quite some time, I'm not sure whether you were aware of this rule. If you're quick, you can still re-revert your last change back to the way it was before you changed it, putting yourself back within the limits of the rule. If someone else reverts your edit first, you lose that opportunity, and you might be blocked from editing for a period of time. See the 3RR report at the 3RR noticeboard. ☺Coppertwig (talk) 23:46, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Unhelpful edits
Hello. You've recently made a series of edits on economics articles. Some of these edits do not confirm to NPOV guidlines, and some involve the blanking of unsoruced matereal without instead requesting citations. Please avoid doing these again: especially deleting the same line a second time on a different page after references had been added for it on the first. Thankyou, Larklight (talk) 20:27, 13 April 2008 (UTC)