Misplaced Pages

User talk:Sroy1947: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:38, 13 April 2008 editGallileo2k (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users29,065 edits report← Previous edit Revision as of 06:51, 13 April 2008 edit undoGallileo2k (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users29,065 edits reNext edit →
Line 20: Line 20:


Since you just broke it (including the anon ip), I'll report you. Thanks. --] (]) 06:38, 13 April 2008 (UTC) Since you just broke it (including the anon ip), I'll report you. Thanks. --] (]) 06:38, 13 April 2008 (UTC)


There is no excuse for reverting valid references. And mere discussion does not allow you to break 3RR.

Sure, I'm including that IP in my report.

So what if you put a dispute tag? You are blanking references.

Dwaipayanc can be found on the other side of the world from myself. :). --] (]) 06:51, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:51, 13 April 2008

Welcome!

Hello, Sroy1947, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Dwaipayan (talk) 16:43, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

3RR

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --Ragib (talk) 06:38, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Since you just broke it (including the anon ip), I'll report you. Thanks. --Ragib (talk) 06:38, 13 April 2008 (UTC)


There is no excuse for reverting valid references. And mere discussion does not allow you to break 3RR.

Sure, I'm including that IP in my report.

So what if you put a dispute tag? You are blanking references.

Dwaipayanc can be found on the other side of the world from myself. :). --Ragib (talk) 06:51, 13 April 2008 (UTC)