Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 11:28, 14 April 2008

Euthanasia

OK. Would you also care to look at the paragraph above? It too was original research, look at it:

Others respond to this argument by pointing out that if a nondisabled person attempts suicide, all measures possible are taken to save their lives. Suicidal people are often given involuntary medical treatment so that they will not die. This argument states that it is due to societal prejudice, namely that disabled people are of lower worth and that any unhappiness must be due to the disability, which results in greater support of voluntary euthanasia by disabled people than suicide by nondisabled people.

This does not cite any reference, and what I stated is logically absolutely true as a rebuttal to this sentence. None the less I do appreciate it wasn't the correct thing to do. Will you be removing this paragraph also? It is guilty of exactly the same issue. -- Nevermind, I removed it myself. Without a credible citation then this paragraph too is original research and since it's logically inaccurate - it would seem sensible to delete it.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.109.12.253 (talk) 23:51, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks, my friend.

Timothy Perper (talk) 01:37, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Give me a letter

Give me a letter that I can work on dab cleans that you will not be looking at please ... this will keep us away from each other. Answer here pls. Abtract (talk) 01:08, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

There's really no answer for this one. But why remove pertinent red links at the Seru dab as you did here? That goes against MoS:DAB#Red links. Thoughts? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 06:05, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Redlinks are only allowed by mos:dab#Red links when they are accompanied by a bluelinked article which itself contains that same redlink; I quote "Red links should not be the only link in a given entry; link also to an existing article, so that a reader (as opposed to a contributing editor) will have somewhere to navigate to for additional information.". The way they were on the page you mention there was no target article, therefore nothing to disambiguate, therefore they had to go ... you have asked JHJ for an opinion, I will be amazed if he says otherwise. As to the letter ... are you really saying you are not willing to give up just one or two letters so that I can work undisturbed there (bearing in mind that you will then be undisturbed elsewhere)? But see my amended offer next. Abtract (talk) 09:30, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

An offer you surely can't refuse

Having thought more about how we might keep apart (it certainly isn't working now) and not concerning ourselves with whose fault it is (surely both), I would like to make you a generous offer: Give me a third of the alphabet and you can have the other two thirds to work on unhindered by me. I will not edit any dab page (all types) within your range and I would expect you to do the same in my range. If we stumble across something we feel strongly about in the other's range, then we can make a note on the talk page for other editors to consider. I have chosen a 2:1 ratio because I want you to see that I am giving you more than I ask of you in order to encourage you to accept. So, pick any range of nine consecutive letters for me and you can have the remainder. I think this is pretty generous and rather foolproof. Reply here please. :) Abtract (talk) 11:49, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

"Vandalism" of Tupac Shakur

How was my edit of 2pac vandalism? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bully25 (talk • contribs) 13:22, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Sockadelic

New editor at Powers and abilities of the Hulk, could quite possibly be another sock. Check out Special:Contributions/TheJaff and see what you think. Thanks! Redrocket (talk) 16:09, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Tenshinhan

Your friend prede is soooooooo biased and a liar isn't he?lol. In the link i posted everyone in the site daizenshuu ex said daizenshuu 7 states tenshin as an alien but as always he decided to lie and made up excuses,lol. DB fanboys in wikipedia are so hypocrite and pathetic.This loser never showed any scans never but his dumb fake guide book is reliable,ahahahahah. DB wikipedia articles=trash made by fanboys who disrespect wikipedia rules like show references sources,maybe once,lol. Nobody said daizenshuu 7 or dbzbt tenkaichi 3 were wrong. Everything your friend posted about tenshin is nonsense and with no proof at all.

Toriyama didn't write the Daizenshû himself, but he has read it, enjoyed it, and he approved the book for release. We also know that he himself wrote some paragraphs in the book. Thus it's a canonical source. However we can wonder how the "tenshinhan is an extraterrestrial" thing was really usefull, as it has never been brought forth in the manga. But since Gokû's tail makes him an extraterrestrial, why couldn't Tenshinhan's 3rd eye make him alien also ? And the manga didn't specifically state that Ten' was a human. Thus the alien explanation is at least coherent and it should be mentionned in the infobox, at least in the form "human/alien". Folken de Fanel 18:54, 16 July 2006 (UTC)