Revision as of 00:22, 9 August 2005 editUser2004 (talk | contribs)23,415 edits keep← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:20, 9 August 2005 edit undoSdedeo (talk | contribs)5,246 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*'''Keep''', published author. ] 22:49, 8 August 2005 (UTC) | *'''Keep''', published author. ] 22:49, 8 August 2005 (UTC) | ||
*'''Keep'''. Significant as politician and author. Commendably modest too. -] 00:22, August 9, 2005 (UTC) | *'''Keep'''. Significant as politician and author. Commendably modest too. -] 00:22, August 9, 2005 (UTC) | ||
*'''Keep'''. Notable for modesty, at the very least. But, seriously, someone should check out some of the claims in the article sometime. Do Brits really use his website? ] 01:20, 9 August 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:20, 9 August 2005
David Boothroyd
I am nominating this article about myself for deletion as I don't think I make the notability criteria (although possibly verging on them). However I reserve the right to become notable in the future. David | Talk 22:02, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep I don't really want to argue with you about your own notability, but running "the most comprehensive election results database in the United Kingdom" seems pretty notable. Soltak 22:45, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, published author. Kappa 22:49, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Significant as politician and author. Commendably modest too. -Willmcw 00:22, August 9, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Notable for modesty, at the very least. But, seriously, someone should check out some of the claims in the article sometime. Do Brits really use his website? Sdedeo 01:20, 9 August 2005 (UTC)