Misplaced Pages

:Requests for comment/Philosophy: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:41, 9 August 2005 editRadiant! (talk | contribs)36,918 edits fix tl← Previous edit Revision as of 21:29, 11 August 2005 edit undoGirolamo Savonarola (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers60,983 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{RFCheader|Philosophy}} {{RFCheader|Philosophy}}


*] - debate about whether or not to change naming standard en masse. Disambiguation and naming issues. Needs more voices. *] - debate about whether or not to change naming standard en masse. We're starting to wrap things up (I hope) and would like a few more people to weigh in on some final issues. --] 21:29, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

*] - Revert war about changes to introductory paragraph. Edits by anonymous user involve unnecessary archiving of very recent and relevant material and editing of the comments of other users; repeated reversion and referring to the comments of others as "obscurantist" and "vandalism" . See also ] 21:06, July 19, 2005 (UTC) *] - Revert war about changes to introductory paragraph. Edits by anonymous user involve unnecessary archiving of very recent and relevant material and editing of the comments of other users; repeated reversion and referring to the comments of others as "obscurantist" and "vandalism" . See also ] 21:06, July 19, 2005 (UTC)



Revision as of 21:29, 11 August 2005

Template:RFCheader

  • Talk:Truth - Revert war about changes to introductory paragraph. Edits by anonymous user involve unnecessary archiving of very recent and relevant material and editing of the comments of other users; repeated reversion and referring to the comments of others as "obscurantist" and "vandalism" . See also talk:true 21:06, July 19, 2005 (UTC)
  • talk:atheism NPOV complaint about deletion of links which criticize atheism.
  • Adi Shankara — there has for some time been a battle between editors who wish to state dates for Shankara that are accepted by most scholarly authorities (religious, philosophical, and historical), and those who wish to give more weight to the very different view of a set of religious institutions connected with Shankara. 21:42, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
This question is not written from a NPOV, because it assumes there are different uses (that are noteworthy in an encyclopedia) of the term "libertarianism", which is a point in contention. --Serge 18:39, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Talk:Ad hominem Should the article include the neologism "Inverted Ad Hominem"? There is concern that the term itself has very rare usage and its meaning is not self-evident. It was invented several months ago by the same person who inserted it into the Misplaced Pages article. He claims that recognition of the fallacy supports its own inclusion. 09:19, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
Categories: