| Revision as of 18:03, 22 April 2008 editSteve Smith (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,250 edits →Sock evidence: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:54, 22 April 2008 edit undoNathan (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers13,146 edits →FYI: Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Proposed_topic_ban:_User:JoshuaZ_on_Daniel_BrandtNext edit → | ||
| Line 175: | Line 175: | ||
| I didn't like the wording of the proposal on ] per se. I support, however the wording put forth by Doc on his essay to be the actual proposal. The former is too grey and misleading to achieve its intended purpose without causing collateral damage, while the latter is a lot better. Based on how deletion debates have gone in the past, I foresee several potential problems with the former wording without any additional qualifiers. - ''Best regards'', ] 14:13, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | I didn't like the wording of the proposal on ] per se. I support, however the wording put forth by Doc on his essay to be the actual proposal. The former is too grey and misleading to achieve its intended purpose without causing collateral damage, while the latter is a lot better. Based on how deletion debates have gone in the past, I foresee several potential problems with the former wording without any additional qualifiers. - ''Best regards'', ] 14:13, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == FYI: AN/I Thread (Proposed topic ban) == | |||
| == FYI: ] == | |||
| ] <span style="font-variant:small-caps"><font color="#800080">] § ]/]</font></span> 16:06, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | ] <span style="font-variant:small-caps"><font color="#800080">] § ]/]</font></span> 16:06, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
| * I don't really want to comment either way in the thread there, but I might suggest (as did another) that you decide on your own to remove yourself from this particular topic for the future. ]] 18:54, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Gary Parker == | == Gary Parker == | ||
Revision as of 18:54, 22 April 2008
Important I prefer to keep conversations in one place. So if you send put a talk message on my page, I will respond there. However, if I leave a talk message on your page, and you respond here, I will respond on your page for consistency.
Talk Archive000 Talk Archive001 Talk Archive002 Talk Archive003 Talk Archive004 Talk Archive005 Talk Archive006 Talk Archive007 Talk Archive008 Next archiving will occur around August 25
Film producer
At Don Murphy, can you review my revision and see what can ultimately be incorporated into the article? RTFA (talk) 16:27, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Daniel Brandt
I have replied on my talk page. Prodego 20:58, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
- Replied again. You might want to consider archiving this page, it is a bit long. Prodego 00:16, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- Replied again. Prodego 00:50, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Follow-up to your 3RR complaint
Hi Joshua. Do you have a recommendation of what to do next in this 3RR case? The people you cited in the original complaint have stopped, but now there are some different bad editors. If any regular editors are working on this article, they can probably keep up with the level of inappropriate editing that remains there now. Unless you have another suggestion. I had suggested semi-protection but B is not sure it's needed.
By the way, hello from the NYC WP meeting; I enjoyed meeting you there. EdJohnston (talk) 21:17, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 31st, 2008.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 14 | 31 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 21:16, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi!
I've seen you all over the place lately (even when I looked up Paul Weyrich just now and saw your comment on the talk page from 2006), so I just wanted to say hi and tell you to keep up the good work. :) --Alexc3 15:26, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Pictures
Misplaced Pages:Meetup/NYC is calling for individuals to add their names to the picture captions. You may if you wish. EdJohnston (talk) 18:42, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Request for arbitration
A request for arbitration has been made on a matter in which you were involved. You may add yourself as a party and comment if desired at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration#Appeal_of_commuity_ban_of_Iantresman. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 10:13, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
DYK
|
On 11 April, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Doc Paskowitz, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
- DaughterofSun (talk) 09:52, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 7th and 14th, 2008.
Sorry, it seems that the bot quit before completing its run last week. Here is the last two weeks' worth of Signpost. Ralbot (talk) 08:26, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 15 | 7 April 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 16 | 14 April 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:26, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Your participation requested
(Cross-posted to several users' talk pages)
Your participation on User:Raul654/Civil POV pushing would be appreciated. Raul654 (talk) 19:47, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Re:
Thanks for the heads-up! I seem to be forgetting to sign recently... +Hexagon1 04:59, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Re : Conditional support of BLP AfD change
I didn't like the wording of the proposal on WT:BLP per se. I support, however the wording put forth by Doc on his essay to be the actual proposal. The former is too grey and misleading to achieve its intended purpose without causing collateral damage, while the latter is a lot better. Based on how deletion debates have gone in the past, I foresee several potential problems with the former wording without any additional qualifiers. - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 14:13, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
FYI: AN/I Thread (Proposed topic ban)
Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Proposed_topic_ban:_User:JoshuaZ_on_Daniel_Brandt Lawrence Cohen § t/e 16:06, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- I don't really want to comment either way in the thread there, but I might suggest (as did another) that you decide on your own to remove yourself from this particular topic for the future. Avruch 18:54, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Gary Parker
Hey JoshuaZ,
Any chance you know if Gary Parker of ICR/AIG ever had a WP article? If not, I propose to start one. Finding RS in this part of the world might be tricky. My interest has recently been piqued because of an email a friend forwarded to me from a guy who provided a hurrah-preview of Ben Stein's "EXPELLED". Turns out, that same friend has a video from Gary Parker. --Otheus (talk) 16:57, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
heads up.
NonvocalScream (talk) 17:16, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Sock evidence
I'd appreciate a copy (I presume I'm in good standing?). I hope it goes without saying that I'd respect any confidentiality conditions you cared to place on the e-mail. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 18:03, 22 April 2008 (UTC)