Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/David J. Schindler: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:31, 30 April 2008 editJustallofthem (talk | contribs)1,455 edits Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/David J. Schindler  Revision as of 19:12, 30 April 2008 edit undoDhartung (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers24,482 edits David J. Schindler: wkNext edit →
Line 4: Line 4:
:{{la|David J. Schindler}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> :{{la|David J. Schindler}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude>
Multiple issues. ] article on non-notable attorney shot through with copyright violations. ] (]) 17:31, 30 April 2008 (UTC) Multiple issues. ] article on non-notable attorney shot through with copyright violations. ] (]) 17:31, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
*'''Weak keep'''. Those were some high-profile cases he prosecuted as an AUSA. I don't see that his private practice has kept him notable, but notability doesn't expire. It's a terrible article, though, and doesn't need to rehash each and every case (assuming that isn't the copyvio part). --] | ] 19:12, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:12, 30 April 2008

David J. Schindler

David J. Schindler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Multiple issues. WP:COATRACK article on non-notable attorney shot through with copyright violations. Justallofthem (talk) 17:31, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Weak keep. Those were some high-profile cases he prosecuted as an AUSA. I don't see that his private practice has kept him notable, but notability doesn't expire. It's a terrible article, though, and doesn't need to rehash each and every case (assuming that isn't the copyvio part). --Dhartung | Talk 19:12, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Categories: