| Revision as of 19:12, 30 April 2008 editDhartung (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers24,482 edits →David J. Schindler: wk← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:44, 30 April 2008 edit undoKleenupKrew (talk | contribs)1,323 edits →David J. Schindler: deleteNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| Multiple issues. ] article on non-notable attorney shot through with copyright violations. ] (]) 17:31, 30 April 2008 (UTC) | Multiple issues. ] article on non-notable attorney shot through with copyright violations. ] (]) 17:31, 30 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Weak keep'''. Those were some high-profile cases he prosecuted as an AUSA. I don't see that his private practice has kept him notable, but notability doesn't expire. It's a terrible article, though, and doesn't need to rehash each and every case (assuming that isn't the copyvio part). --] | ] 19:12, 30 April 2008 (UTC) | *'''Weak keep'''. Those were some high-profile cases he prosecuted as an AUSA. I don't see that his private practice has kept him notable, but notability doesn't expire. It's a terrible article, though, and doesn't need to rehash each and every case (assuming that isn't the copyvio part). --] | ] 19:12, 30 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' as apparent ] and ] article. The article is hardly about Schindler at all, it is about several cases he was (somehow) connected to but says little about his actual role in them. Some of those cases are notable and have their own articles, some are not. ] (]) 20:44, 30 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:44, 30 April 2008
David J. Schindler
- David J. Schindler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Multiple issues. WP:COATRACK article on non-notable attorney shot through with copyright violations. Justallofthem (talk) 17:31, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- Weak keep. Those were some high-profile cases he prosecuted as an AUSA. I don't see that his private practice has kept him notable, but notability doesn't expire. It's a terrible article, though, and doesn't need to rehash each and every case (assuming that isn't the copyvio part). --Dhartung | Talk 19:12, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as apparent WP:COPYVIO and WP:COATRACK article. The article is hardly about Schindler at all, it is about several cases he was (somehow) connected to but says little about his actual role in them. Some of those cases are notable and have their own articles, some are not. KleenupKrew (talk) 20:44, 30 April 2008 (UTC)