Revision as of 19:29, 30 April 2008 editDarkspots (talk | contribs)6,346 edits →User:SirIsaacBrock: editing evidence section← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:01, 30 April 2008 edit undoDarkspots (talk | contribs)6,346 edits adding mention of Nazi architectureNext edit → | ||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
Chessy999: | Chessy999: | ||
SirIsaacBrock: | SirIsaacBrock: | ||
Chessy999, SirIsaacBrock, and ] (a confirmed sock of SirIsaacBrock) have all edited ]. | |||
This is all too close for coincidence. SirIsaacBrock is banned by the community for disruptive behavior and rampant sockpuppetry (]). Chessy999 has a lot of civility/tendentious editing complaints on his user talk page. This user should be indef blocked as the sockpuppet of a banned user. | This is all too close for coincidence. SirIsaacBrock is banned by the community for disruptive behavior and rampant sockpuppetry (]). Chessy999 has a lot of civility/tendentious editing complaints on his user talk page. This user should be indef blocked as the sockpuppet of a banned user. |
Revision as of 21:01, 30 April 2008
User:SirIsaacBrock
- Suspected sockpuppeteer
SirIsaacBrock (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Suspected sockpuppets
Chessy999 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Report submission by
Darkspots (talk) 19:01, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- Evidence
Chessy999 has edited Monkey-baiting to defend the article in the form written by SirFozzieBrock:
Both users have edited the following (partial) list of articles:
They have both moved Bait (dogs), from some other article name to that article name. Chessy999: SirIsaacBrock:
Chessy999, SirIsaacBrock, and User:WritersCramp (a confirmed sock of SirIsaacBrock) have all edited Nazi architecture.
This is all too close for coincidence. SirIsaacBrock is banned by the community for disruptive behavior and rampant sockpuppetry (Misplaced Pages:List of banned users#SirIsaacBrock). Chessy999 has a lot of civility/tendentious editing complaints on his user talk page. This user should be indef blocked as the sockpuppet of a banned user.
- Comments
- Conclusions