Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Dark Lords Council: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:15, 13 August 2005 editMartg76 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,688 edits delete← Previous edit Revision as of 17:21, 13 August 2005 edit undoA Train (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,385 edits →[]: deleteNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
*'''Comment''': ] seems to be very "]". That doesn't make him wrong (since this article does not seem very useful or well written) but his nominations for deletion should be taken with a grain of salt. ] 17:08, 13 August 2005 (UTC) *'''Comment''': ] seems to be very "]". That doesn't make him wrong (since this article does not seem very useful or well written) but his nominations for deletion should be taken with a grain of salt. ] 17:08, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
*Irrespective of the nominator's credentials, this article is webcruft that should be '''delete'''d. ] 17:15, 13 August 2005 (UTC) *Irrespective of the nominator's credentials, this article is webcruft that should be '''delete'''d. ] 17:15, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. This is in fact an instance of forumcruft and should be deleted; however, that does not excuse the personal attack in ]'s nomination. ] ]/] 17:21, 13 August 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:21, 13 August 2005

Dark Lords Council

Get a life. No place in a serious encyclopedia. Erwin Walsh

  • Keep and ignore this troll, he has VFD a whole slew of material that should not be. Most being stubs that people were editing at the time. Walsh is currently reported for this behavior after refusing to stop. He just sits on new articles and VFDs them without any consideration. (Unsigned by Gorgonzilla)
  • Comment: Erwin Walsh seems to be very "delete-happy". That doesn't make him wrong (since this article does not seem very useful or well written) but his nominations for deletion should be taken with a grain of salt. Explodicle 17:08, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Irrespective of the nominator's credentials, this article is webcruft that should be deleted. Martg76 17:15, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. This is in fact an instance of forumcruft and should be deleted; however, that does not excuse the personal attack in Erwin Walsh's nomination. Fernando Rizo T/C 17:21, 13 August 2005 (UTC)