Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Imperial Mark: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:11, 14 August 2005 editLomedae (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users790 editsm []← Previous edit Revision as of 08:57, 15 August 2005 edit undoDavidFarmbrough (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,313 edits []: add original talk page commentsNext edit →
Line 3: Line 3:
*'''Delete''' as unverifiable, if nothing else. --] 12:02, 14 August 2005 (UTC) *'''Delete''' as unverifiable, if nothing else. --] 12:02, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' as per above --] 13:11, August 14, 2005 (UTC) *'''Delete''' as per above --] 13:11, August 14, 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' My comments on the talk page were: Is there any independent source for this? Most of the information seems to be lifted directly from the commercial web site. Doing a Google check shows various press releases from the company behind the Imperial Mark, but nothing AFAICS from anyone independent. A news item such as this: originates from IC, the International Charter Organisation themselves. A search of Omega's own site reveals no mention of the Mark, there is likewise nothing on the Harrods site, nor as far as I can see on the Rolex site. ] 09:00 (BST) 15 Aug 2005

Revision as of 08:57, 15 August 2005

Imperial Mark

Very likely an advertisement, no apparent notability. See also comments on talk page. Sandstein 10:14, 14 August 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete as unverifiable, if nothing else. --Apyule 12:02, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete as per above --Lomedae 13:11, August 14, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete My comments on the talk page were: Is there any independent source for this? Most of the information seems to be lifted directly from the commercial web site. Doing a Google check shows various press releases from the company behind the Imperial Mark, but nothing AFAICS from anyone independent. A news item such as this: originates from IC, the International Charter Organisation themselves. A search of Omega's own site reveals no mention of the Mark, there is likewise nothing on the Harrods site, nor as far as I can see on the Rolex site. DavidFarmbrough 09:00 (BST) 15 Aug 2005