Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Chelsea Charms: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:17, 16 August 2005 editNoitall (talk | contribs)3,112 edits []← Previous edit Revision as of 13:20, 16 August 2005 edit undoNoitall (talk | contribs)3,112 edits []Next edit →
Line 6: Line 6:
*'''Keep'''; you don't have to agree with what she does, but she's notable enough ] 11:26, 16 August 2005 (UTC) *'''Keep'''; you don't have to agree with what she does, but she's notable enough ] 11:26, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
*'''Keep''', I agree with the comment of Lectonar and Tregoweth. Misplaced Pages is not censored for anyone's protection and if you don't want to see it, simply don't click it and stay away from sex-related article. No reason in deletion policy to delete this. A doubt much other women have breasts that size, so only that would make her notable enough. - ]|] 11:28, August 16, 2005 (UTC) *'''Keep''', I agree with the comment of Lectonar and Tregoweth. Misplaced Pages is not censored for anyone's protection and if you don't want to see it, simply don't click it and stay away from sex-related article. No reason in deletion policy to delete this. A doubt much other women have breasts that size, so only that would make her notable enough. - ]|] 11:28, August 16, 2005 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' The issue of deletion of a page is notability and she is notable. The picture is an appropriate version of her as a person, not in any sex act. Many of us do believe that Wiki needs standards, see ], but there is nothing here to cause the deletion of anything on this page. --] 13:17, August 16, 2005 (UTC) *'''Keep''' The issue of deletion of a page is notability and she is notable. The picture is an appropriate version of her as a person, not in any sex act. Many of us do believe that Wiki needs standards, see ], but there is nothing here to cause the deletion of anything on this page. One more important point: nothing in this article or picture was done specifically to get on Wiki--she did it on her own to promote herself and her career. --] 13:17, August 16, 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:20, 16 August 2005

Chelsea Charms

Hay everyone! Im new here and new to this deletion stuff. I think this page should be deleted because it is just nasty! I mean, what kind of woman does that to herself? She is SO ugly. Also she is very non-notable, she is just here so sicko-nerds who dont like to surf out of wiki can come here and masturbate I think. Also we shouldnt promote this kinda harm, she probably has back problems, what if some woman comes here and thinks "id like to be like that" and decides to have an augmentation that completely destroys her health because of Misplaced Pages? Also, what if kids come here, they will be shocked and traumatized by those sick breasts. I also heard that a lot of libraries and stuff block Misplaced Pages (which is a great tool!) from there computers because it has porn on it like this "lady". Delete her! She is no good! DavidsCrusader 10:52, 16 August 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete like I said above, PS. She offends all Americans by calling herself "Americas Huge Boob Sweetheart"! If you are American please fix this offense by deleting her off of here! -DavidsCrusader 10:54, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep; articles shouldn't be deleted just because you personally disagree with the subject. tregoweth 11:25, August 16, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep; you don't have to agree with what she does, but she's notable enough Lectonar 11:26, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, I agree with the comment of Lectonar and Tregoweth. Misplaced Pages is not censored for anyone's protection and if you don't want to see it, simply don't click it and stay away from sex-related article. No reason in deletion policy to delete this. A doubt much other women have breasts that size, so only that would make her notable enough. - Mgm| 11:28, August 16, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep The issue of deletion of a page is notability and she is notable. The picture is an appropriate version of her as a person, not in any sex act. Many of us do believe that Wiki needs standards, see Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Wikipedians for Decency, but there is nothing here to cause the deletion of anything on this page. One more important point: nothing in this article or picture was done specifically to get on Wiki--she did it on her own to promote herself and her career. --Noitall 13:17, August 16, 2005 (UTC)