Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 10:39, 10 May 2008

Pornography Start‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

There should be a redirect to marshmellow fluff. That is what I was looking for...

For an October 2004 deletion debate over this page see Misplaced Pages:Votes for deletion/Fluffer

The original article, in very poor taste, but accurate, was almost immediately put to Speedy. I posted a request to reconsider the Speedy, but this got ignored. I don't feel that's right. (You'll look at my own edits, and I'm sure find I normally have no truck with this stuff — but this is in the interest of (a) fairness and (b) some notability: the word appears (with this meaning) on 4 or 5 pages out of the 7 that are automatically shown when you search for it. — Bill 20:31, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)

revert war

Haydes and Texture: watch your reverts. The problem appears to be "Usually its a guy." Please stop the reverts and discuss your issues here. Whosyourjudas (talk) 21:17, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)

What is the controversy? Admittedly I am certainly no expert on fluffers, but it stands to reason that they would typically be the sex that the fluffee finds attractive. Are most men in gay porn not gay? This could be explained in the article, and would certainly be preferabe to an edt war. -R. fiend 05:55, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)

external links

added links to IMDB pages of the two movies titled The Fluffer since there are no Misplaced Pages articles about them. --Smooth Henry 17:21, Apr 22, 2005 (UTC)

Swipes

The material about burlesque and real estate fluffing added in version http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Fluffing&oldid=41551064 is a direct copy from http://www.fluffer.com/what.html which is copyrighted.

The reference "has drawn bad reviews from several critics after being unmeritously compared to Boogie Nights by its producers" is both unrelated to fluffing and non-neutral point of view.

lesbian films

I just finished an all-girl adult film, and happened to catch a credit for the fluffer. Intrigued, I came here to find out what the task of a fluffer might be in such a case. I seem to have come up empty handed, no pun intended. The Taped Crusader 09:34, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

ALLY MCBEAL, DAMMIT!!

Did anybody seem to forget that legendary introduction to the public conciousness?! Sweetfreek 08:05, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Long list of other meanings

Almost completely uncited. And shouldn't this be Wiktionary stuff? - Jmabel | Talk 05:22, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Either disambiguation of the term (if its other meanings are notable), or wiktionary (if not), would work for me too. Not really article content. FT2  09:55, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

I agree and I think it should be removed. -Adam —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.175.83.43 (talk) 12:20, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Move

A fluffer in the context of the main definition in this article is a makeup artist? Would someone care to explain that one? Equazcion •✗/C • 08:39, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

I was about to ask the same question. The article states the fluffer is considered to be part of the makeup department, but makeup is not the "main duty" of a fluffer. APK 08:48, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Also, there is no spacing between "Fluffer" and the parentheses. APK 08:50, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

One more thing and I'm done for now. I don't think the current definition on the new dab page is the most accurate description: "Fluffer(makeup artist) is a hairdressing and makeup term. Fluffers were originally those who touched up an actress's hair and makeup during a shoot." It leaves out the stimulation aspect and fluffers are not just for females. APK 08:59, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Unsourced/Notability/Move

When I first saw this article has 12 possible definitions listed within the article, that makes it a logical page to be disambiguated. Which I was bold and did, fair enough it got reverted. That then brings the next issue to the fore the article doenst have any citation that show what the article says is the primary term nor does it assert why a fluffer is notable. Gnangarra 10:39, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

• Start-Class Pornography articles
• Low-importance Pornography articles
• Start-Class Low-importance Pornography articles
• WikiProject Pornography articles