| Revision as of 07:22, 17 August 2005 editUser2004 (talk | contribs)23,415 edits del "often", if it isn't for that prupose then it isn't stalking, del "deconstruction" too vague, leave it with harassment← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:29, 17 August 2005 edit undoUser2004 (talk | contribs)23,415 edits →Wikipedian viewpoints on stalking: move "bad WS" graf into that seciton, re-arrange sections, add "POV pushing" to examplesNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| ===Wikipedian viewpoints on stalking=== | ===Wikipedian viewpoints on stalking=== | ||
| The practice of wikistalking is considered very objectionable to some editors, though others find the practice of monitoring user contributions vital in maintaining a quality encyclopedia, including when this is done through the monitoring of one's own watchlist. Critics of wikistalking often distinguish the practice, which is conducted for the purpose of harassment, from normal editor monitoring for constructive purposes such as removing vandalism or correcting errors. | The practice of wikistalking is considered very objectionable to some editors, though others find the practice of monitoring user contributions vital in maintaining a quality encyclopedia, including when this is done through the monitoring of one's own watchlist. Critics of wikistalking often distinguish the practice, which is conducted for the purpose of harassment, from normal editor monitoring for constructive purposes such as removing vandalism or correcting errors. | ||
| ⚫ | According to one view, wiki-] occurs when an editor abusively trails another editor around wikipedia by way of his or her user contributions page. It entails an evidenced distinctive editing pattern in which one user intentionally follows another editor around wikipedia for purposes that are not constructive to the encyclopedia's content or conducive to its collaborative environment. It occurs when one editor continuously and repeatedly follows another editor between multiple unrelated articles over an extended period of time and a wide variety of unrelated subjects for the purpose of making excessive "followup" changes to the original editor's work for the purpose of harassment of the stalked editor's work for reasons that are not in compliance with Misplaced Pages policies or guidelines. | ||
| While wikistalking can be very annoying, every editor gets followed from time to time. Editors may expect unusually frequent amounts of "stalking" or following when they are the subject of a nomination for ] or promotion to a similar position of authority. While being followed it might be wise to have impeccable behaviour, but you already were behaving impeccably anyway, right? | While wikistalking can be very annoying, every editor gets followed from time to time. Editors may expect unusually frequent amounts of "stalking" or following when they are the subject of a nomination for ] or promotion to a similar position of authority. While being followed it might be wise to have impeccable behaviour, but you already were behaving impeccably anyway, right? | ||
| ⚫ | ===="Good" stalking==== | ||
| ⚫ | The practice of following editors should not be categorically ill reputed. Although it is highly discouraged to follow a contributor that clashes with your beliefs or for purposes of harassment, trailing a public nuisance to Misplaced Pages is considered by some contributers as a commendable sign of your dedication. For example stalking an anonymous ] so that (s)he/it understands vandalizing or degrading Misplaced Pages is a fruitless hobby could be considered a "good" form of stalking. There are many such vandals, so editors often find a need to systematically follow them. There may be many other legitimate reasons for following another editor, so it is a good idea to have a justification for such activity so that it can clearly be seen as good stalking. | ||
| ===="Bad" stalking==== | ===="Bad" stalking==== | ||
| Notwithstanding the practice of detering vandalism, stalking does carry ill rupute for a reason. In general, one should try to ], so stalking people who don't have track records of vandalism or other unacceptable editing patterns could be viewed as a sign of being somebody who lacks anything resembling a sense of proportion. | Notwithstanding the practice of detering vandalism, stalking does carry ill rupute for a reason. In general, one should try to ], so stalking people who don't have track records of vandalism, POV pushing, or other unacceptable editing patterns could be viewed as a sign of being somebody who lacks anything resembling a sense of proportion. | ||
| It is argued by some that wiki-stalking is an abuse of the user contributions function on wikipedia. This is a tool that otherwise serves valuable purposes in combatting vandalism and problematic users, but like any tool it can be abused when used in excess or with malicious intent. Stalking can be problematic because it can exhibit incivility, subject individual editors to unwarranted harassment, and violate the request that all wikipedians should assume good faith about other editors. Sometimes a stalker conducts himself with the intent of driving another editor away from Misplaced Pages through a pattern of harassing and hostile behavior. This practice is considered bad stalking. | It is argued by some that wiki-stalking is an abuse of the user contributions function on wikipedia. This is a tool that otherwise serves valuable purposes in combatting vandalism and problematic users, but like any tool it can be abused when used in excess or with malicious intent. Stalking can be problematic because it can exhibit incivility, subject individual editors to unwarranted harassment, and violate the request that all wikipedians should assume good faith about other editors. Sometimes a stalker conducts himself with the intent of driving another editor away from Misplaced Pages through a pattern of harassing and hostile behavior. This practice is considered bad stalking. | ||
| ⚫ | According to one view, wiki-] occurs when an editor abusively trails another editor around wikipedia by way of his or her user contributions page. It entails an evidenced distinctive editing pattern in which one user intentionally follows another editor around wikipedia for purposes that are not constructive to the encyclopedia's content or conducive to its collaborative environment. It occurs when one editor continuously and repeatedly follows another editor between multiple unrelated articles over an extended period of time and a wide variety of unrelated subjects for the purpose of making excessive "followup" changes to the original editor's work for the purpose of harassment of the stalked editor's work for reasons that are not in compliance with Misplaced Pages policies or guidelines. | ||
| ⚫ | ===="Good" stalking==== | ||
| ⚫ | The practice of following editors should not be categorically ill reputed. Although it is highly discouraged to follow a contributor that clashes with your beliefs or for purposes of harassment, trailing a public nuisance to Misplaced Pages is considered by some contributers as a commendable sign of your dedication. For example stalking an anonymous ] so that (s)he/it understands vandalizing or degrading Misplaced Pages is a fruitless hobby could be considered a "good" form of stalking. There are many such vandals, so editors often find a need to systematically follow them. There may be many other legitimate reasons for following another editor, so it is a good idea to have a justification for such activity so that it can clearly be seen as good stalking. | ||
| ====False accusations of stalking==== | ====False accusations of stalking==== | ||
Revision as of 07:29, 17 August 2005
 | The following is a proposed Misplaced Pages policy, guideline, or process. The proposal may still be in development, under discussion, or in the process of gathering consensus for adoption. |
The term wikistalking or wiki-stalking describes a pattern of editing behavior in which one contributor intentionally follows and makes changes to the edits of another solely for the purpose of harassment or disruption.
Definition
According to a recent decision of the Misplaced Pages Arbitration Committee
- "The term "wiki-stalking" has been coined to describe following a contributor around the wiki, editing the same articles as the target, with the intent of causing annoyance or distress to another contributor. This is distinct from following a contributor in order to clear repeated errors."
Wikipedian viewpoints on stalking
The practice of wikistalking is considered very objectionable to some editors, though others find the practice of monitoring user contributions vital in maintaining a quality encyclopedia, including when this is done through the monitoring of one's own watchlist. Critics of wikistalking often distinguish the practice, which is conducted for the purpose of harassment, from normal editor monitoring for constructive purposes such as removing vandalism or correcting errors.
While wikistalking can be very annoying, every editor gets followed from time to time. Editors may expect unusually frequent amounts of "stalking" or following when they are the subject of a nomination for Adminship or promotion to a similar position of authority. While being followed it might be wise to have impeccable behaviour, but you already were behaving impeccably anyway, right?
"Bad" stalking
Notwithstanding the practice of detering vandalism, stalking does carry ill rupute for a reason. In general, one should try to assume good faith, so stalking people who don't have track records of vandalism, POV pushing, or other unacceptable editing patterns could be viewed as a sign of being somebody who lacks anything resembling a sense of proportion.
It is argued by some that wiki-stalking is an abuse of the user contributions function on wikipedia. This is a tool that otherwise serves valuable purposes in combatting vandalism and problematic users, but like any tool it can be abused when used in excess or with malicious intent. Stalking can be problematic because it can exhibit incivility, subject individual editors to unwarranted harassment, and violate the request that all wikipedians should assume good faith about other editors. Sometimes a stalker conducts himself with the intent of driving another editor away from Misplaced Pages through a pattern of harassing and hostile behavior. This practice is considered bad stalking.
According to one view, wiki-stalking occurs when an editor abusively trails another editor around wikipedia by way of his or her user contributions page. It entails an evidenced distinctive editing pattern in which one user intentionally follows another editor around wikipedia for purposes that are not constructive to the encyclopedia's content or conducive to its collaborative environment. It occurs when one editor continuously and repeatedly follows another editor between multiple unrelated articles over an extended period of time and a wide variety of unrelated subjects for the purpose of making excessive "followup" changes to the original editor's work for the purpose of harassment of the stalked editor's work for reasons that are not in compliance with Misplaced Pages policies or guidelines.
"Good" stalking
The practice of following editors should not be categorically ill reputed. Although it is highly discouraged to follow a contributor that clashes with your beliefs or for purposes of harassment, trailing a public nuisance to Misplaced Pages is considered by some contributers as a commendable sign of your dedication. For example stalking an anonymous vandal so that (s)he/it understands vandalizing or degrading Misplaced Pages is a fruitless hobby could be considered a "good" form of stalking. There are many such vandals, so editors often find a need to systematically follow them. There may be many other legitimate reasons for following another editor, so it is a good idea to have a justification for such activity so that it can clearly be seen as good stalking.
False accusations of stalking
There may be a number of reasons why someone wrongly claims another person is cyberstalking them. Some new users are not aware of the watchlist, or of the easy access all readers have to the contributions of all users. They feel the act of being watched is bad cyberstalking even though this is not the case in most cases. Bad faith users such as vandals may claim that those who are pursuing them in the best interests of wikipedia are in fact stalking them.
New users who believe they are being followed should be aware that the project is collaborative and that editors frequently check each other's work. In the event that a user believes he or she is being unduly followed, that user should politely communicate with the other editor by way of article and user talk pages before making allegations of stalking. Often times a simple case of misunderstanding may exist that can be resolved by discussion. Remember to assume good faith.
Wiki-stalking precedents
Abusive forms of stalking on Misplaced Pages have been deemed inherently disruptive in the past and have resulted in penalties against the editor engaged in stalking. Wiki-stalking has been the subject of at least two major dispute resolution proceedings, both of which have resulted in severe penalties being applied against the stalker.
The most notable case to date happened from February to March 2005. The incident involved an editor named The Recycling Troll (TRT), who was banned for an extensive pattern of stalking against Misplaced Pages administrator RickK in which the former trailed the latter's edits on a daily basis, making subsequent and mostly minor changes to his work for the purpose of harassment. After a contentious arbitration dispute over the proper way to handle TRT's behavior, Misplaced Pages founder Jimbo Wales intervened and permanently blocked TRT. According to Wales' decision, "the Recycling Troll was making a pest of himself by harassing RickK." The stalking edits were "clearly not attempts to help" in Misplaced Pages's mission of writing an encyclopedia. As such, stalking as it occured in this case constituted disrupting wikipedia to illustrate a point. TRT was subsequently banned by Wales.
In a similar case, User:Skyring was penalized during Arbitraition by Committee on August 12, 2005 for wiki-stalking. According to the decision adopted unanimously by the participating arbitrators, Skyring is "banned from Misplaced Pages for one year for wiki-stalking and acting in bad faith towards other contributors."
Dealing with Wiki-Stalking
- If you are being stalked in a harassing manner by another user, the first thing you should do is politely approach him/her about it. Inform that editor of your concern and objections and ask him/her politely to stop. It is possible that he/she may not even realize this behavior is harassing to you and a simple polite note could resolve the situation. Also keep in mind that the other editor may have a genuine reason for reviewing your work or it could be a simple matter of misunderstanding.
- If step 1 doesn't work and you still believe that the editor is engaged in stalking of the "bad" type, politely inform the stalker of Misplaced Pages's anti-stalking precedents.
See also
- Cyberstalking
- Wikistalking and cliques info (from which a large amount of text here has been drawn)
- Wiktionary definition of "stalk"