Misplaced Pages

Large Hadron Collider: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:51, 13 May 2008 editClueBot (talk | contribs)1,596,818 editsm Reverting possible vandalism by 85.218.41.120 to version by Epbr123. False positive? Report it. Thanks, User:ClueBot. (373292) (Bot)← Previous edit Revision as of 19:52, 13 May 2008 edit undo142.162.137.79 (talk) ←Replaced content with 'OH SHI- I DIVIDED BY ZERO!'Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
OH SHI- I DIVIDED BY ZERO!
{{redirect|LHC}}
{{coord|46|14|N|06|03|E|type:landmark|display=title}}<!--to verify-->
The '''Large Hadron Collider''' ('''LHC''') is a ] located at ], near ], ]. It lies in a tunnel under ] and Switzerland.

The LHC is in the final stages of construction, and commissioning, with some sections already being cooled down to their final operating temperature of ~2]. The first beams are due for injection mid June 2008 with the first collisions planned to take place 2 months later.<ref> - ''A word from the DG: The home straight''</ref> The LHC will become the world's largest and highest-energy particle accelerator.<ref name="TGPngm">{{cite journal
| last = Achenbach
| first = Joel
| authorlink = Joel Achenbach
| date = 2008-03-01
| title = The God Particle
| journal = ]
| volume =
| issue =
| pages =
| publisher = ]
| issn = 0027-9358
| url = http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2008/03/god-particle/achenbach-text
| accessdate = 2008-02-25 }}</ref> The LHC is being funded and built in collaboration with over two thousand physicists from thirty-four countries as well as hundreds of ] and laboratories.

When activated, it is theorized that the collider will produce the elusive ], the ] of which could confirm the predictions and "missing links" in the ] of physics and could explain how other ]s acquire properties such as ].<ref>
{{cite journal
|first=John
|last=Ellis
|date=19 July 2007
|title=Beyond the standard model with the LHC
|journal=Nature
|volume=448
|pages=297-301
|doi=10.1038/nature06079
|url=http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v448/n7151/full/nature06079.html
|accessdate=2007-11-24
|quote= There are good reasons to hope that the LHC will find new physics beyond the standard model, but no guarantees. The most one can say for now is that the LHC has the potential to revolutionize particle physics, and that in a few years' time we should know what course this revolution will take.}}</ref><ref name="TGPngm"/> The verification of the existence of the Higgs boson would be a significant step in the search for a ], which seeks to unify three of the four known ]s: ], the ] and the ], leaving out only ]. The Higgs boson may also help to explain why ] is so weak compared to the other three forces. In addition to the Higgs boson, other theorized novel particles that might be produced, and for which searches<ref>I.F. Ginzburg, A. Schiller, “Search for a heavy magnetic monopole at the Fermilab Tevatron and CERN LHC”, , ; A. Angelis et al., "Formation of Centauro and Strangelets in Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions at the LHC and their Identification by the ALICE Experiment”, ; G. L. Alberghi, et al., “Searching for micro black holes at LHC”, IFAE 2006, Incontri di Fisica delle Alte Energie (Italian Meeting on High Energy Physics)</ref> are planned, include ], ], ] and ].<ref>T. Lari, "Search for Supersymmetry with early ATLAS data" </ref>

==Technical design==
] ]s are used to direct the beams to four intersection points where interactions between protons will take place.]]
The collider is contained in a circular tunnel with a circumference of {{convert|27|km|mi|lk=on}} at a depth ranging from 50 to {{nowrap|175 ]s}} underground.<ref>, April 2005</ref> The tunnel, constructed between 1983 and 1988,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://public.web.cern.ch/PUBLIC/en/Research/LEP-en.html|title=CERN - LEP: the Z factory<!-- Bot generated title -->}}</ref> was formerly used to house the ], an ]-] collider.

The 3.8 metre diameter, concrete-lined tunnel crosses the border between ] and ] at four points, although the majority of its length is inside France. The collider itself is underground, with surface buildings holding ancillary equipment such as compressors, ventilation equipment, control electronics and refrigeration plants.

The collider tunnel contains two pipes, each pipe containing a beam. The two beams travel in opposite directions around the ring. 1232 ]s keep the beams on their circular path, while additional 392 ]s are used to keep the beams focused, in order to maximize the chances of interaction between the particles in the four intersection points, where the two beams will cross. In total, over 1600 ]s are installed, with most weighing over 27 tonnes. 96 tonnes of liquid helium is needed to keep the magnets at the operating temperature.<ref></ref>

The protons will each have an ] of {{nowrap|7 ]}}, giving a total collision energy of {{nowrap|14 TeV}}. It will take less than 90 ]s for an individual proton to travel once around the collider. Rather than continuous beams, the protons will be "bunched" together, into 2,808 bunches, so that interactions between the two beams will take place at discrete intervals never shorter than {{nowrap|25 ns}} apart. When the collider is first commissioned, it will be operated with fewer bunches, to give a bunch crossing interval of {{nowrap|75 ns}}. The number of bunches will later be increased to give a final bunch crossing interval of {{nowrap|25 ns}}.<ref>, May 2008</ref>

]
Prior to being injected into the main accelerator, the particles are prepared through a series of systems that successively increase the particle energy levels. The first system is the ] Linac 2 generating {{nowrap|50 MeV}} protons which feeds the ] (PSB). Protons are then injected at {{nowrap|1.4 GeV}} into the ] (PS) at {{nowrap|26 GeV}}. Finally the ] (SPS) is used to increase the energy of protons up to {{nowrap|450 GeV}}.

The LHC will also be used to collide ] (Pb) ]s with a collision energy of {{nowrap|1,150 TeV}}. The ions will be first accelerated by the linear accelerator Linac 3, and the Low-Energy Injector Ring (LEIR) will be used as an ion storage and cooler unit. The ions then will be further accelerated by the ] (PS) and ] (SPS) before being injected into LHC ring, where they will reach an energy of 2.76 TeV per ].

Six detectors are being constructed at the LHC, located underground in large caverns excavated at the LHC's intersection points. Two of them, ] and ], are large, "general purpose" ]s.<ref name="TGPngm"/> ] is a large detector designed to study the properties of ] looking at the debris of heavy ion collisions. The other three (], ], and ]) are relatively smaller and more specialized. A seventh experiment, ] (Forward Physics at {{nowrap|420m}}), has been proposed which would add detectors to four available spaces located {{nowrap|420m}} on either side of the ATLAS and CMS detectors.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.fp420.com|title=FP420 R&D Project}}</ref>

The size of the LHC constitutes an exceptional engineering challenge with unique safety issues. While running, the ] is {{nowrap|10 ]}}, while each of the two beams carries an overall energy of {{nowrap|362 ]}}. For comparison, {{nowrap|362 MJ}} is the ] of a ] running at {{nowrap|157 ]}} ({{nowrap|98 ]}}), while {{nowrap|724 MJ}}, the total energy of the two beams, is equivalent to the detonation energy of approximately {{convert|157|kg|lb}} of TNT, and {{nowrap|10 GJ}} is about {{nowrap|2.5 ]}}. Loss of only 10<sup>&minus;7</sup> of the beam is sufficient to ] a ], while the ] must absorb an energy equivalent to a ].

==Research==
] of one way the ] may be produced at the LHC. Here, two ] each emit a ] which combine to make a neutral Higgs.]]
]
When in operation, about seven thousand scientists from eighty countries will have access to the LHC, the largest national contingent of seven hundred being from the ]. ]s hope to use the collider to test various ] and enhance their ability to answer the following questions:
*Is the popular ] for generating ] ]es in the ] realised in nature? If so, how many ]s are there, and what are their masses?<ref>"...in the public presentations of the aspiration of particle physics we hear too often that the goal of the LHC or a linear collider is to check off the last missing particle of the ], this year’s Holy Grail of particle physics, the Higgs boson. ''The truth is much less boring than that!'' What we’re trying to accomplish is much more exciting, and asking what the world would have been like without the Higgs mechanism is a way of getting at that excitement." -Chris Quigg, </ref>
*Will the more precise measurements of the masses of the ]s continue to be mutually consistent within the Standard Model?
*Do particles have ] ("SUSY") partners?<ref name="TGPngm"/>
*Why are there apparent violations of the ] between ] and ]?<ref name="TGPngm"/> See also ].
*Are there ] indicated by theoretical ], as predicted by various models inspired by ], and can we "see" them?
*What is the nature of ] and ]?<ref name="TGPngm"/>
*Why is ] so many orders of magnitude weaker than the other three ]?

==As an ion collider==
The LHC physics program is mainly based on ]-proton collisions. However, shorter running periods, typically one month per year, with heavy-] collisions are included in the programme. While lighter ions are considered as well, the baseline scheme deals with ] (Pb) ions.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://project-i-lhc.web.cern.ch/project-i-lhc/Welcome.htm|title=Ions for LHC}}</ref> This will allow an advancement in the experimental programme currently in progress at the ] (RHIC).

==Proposed upgrade==
] detector for LHC]]
After some years of running, any ] experiment typically begins to suffer from ]; each additional year of operation discovers less than the year before. The way around the diminishing returns is to upgrade the experiment, either in energy or in luminosity.

A ] upgrade of the LHC, called the ], has been proposed,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://chep.knu.ac.kr/ICFA-Seminar/upload/9.29/Morning/session1/Ruggiero-ICFA-05.pdf|title=PDF presentation of proposed LHC upgrade|format=PDF}}</ref> to be made after ten years of LHC operation. The optimal path for the LHC luminosity upgrade includes an increase in the beam current (i.e., the number of protons in the beams) and the modification of the two high luminosity interaction regions, ATLAS and CMS. To achieve these increases, the energy of the beams at the point that they are injected into the (Super) LHC should also be increased to {{nowrap|1 TeV}}. This will require an upgrade of the full pre-injector system, the needed changes in the ] being the most expensive.

==Cost==
The construction of LHC was approved in 1995 with a budget of {{nowrap|2.6 billion}} ]s, with another {{nowrap|210 million }}francs ({{nowrap|140 M€}}) towards the cost of the experiments. However, cost over-runs, estimated in a major review in 2001 at around {{nowrap|480 million}} francs ({{nowrap|300 M€}}) for the accelerator, and {{nowrap|50 million}} francs ({{nowrap|30 M€}}) for the experiments, along with a reduction in CERN's budget, pushed the completion date from 2005 to April 2007.<ref>{{cite web
| url=http://user.web.cern.ch/User/LHCCost/2001-10-16/LHCCostReview.html
| title = LHC Cost Review to Completion| last = Maiani| first = Luciano
| accessdate = 2001-01-15|date=16 October 2001| publisher = CERN
}}</ref>
180 million francs ({{nowrap|120 M€}}) of the cost increase have been due to the superconducting magnets. There were also engineering difficulties encountered while building the underground cavern for the Compact Muon Solenoid. In part this was due to ] lent to CERN by fellow laboratories ] (home to the world's largest particle accelerator until CERN finishes the Large Hadron Collider) or ].<ref>{{cite journal
| last = Feder | first = Toni | year = 2001 | month = December | accessdate = 2007-01-15
| title = CERN Grapples with LHC Cost Hike | journal = ]
| volume = 54 | issue = 12 | pages = 21 | doi = | id = | url=http://www.aip.org/pt/vol-54/iss-12/p21b.html
}}</ref> The total cost of the project is anticipated to be between $5 and $10 billion (US Dollars).<ref name="TGPngm"/>

==LHC@Home==
{{main|LHC@home}}
The ] project was started to support the construction and calibration of the LHC. The project uses the ] platform to simulate how particles will travel in the tunnel. With this information, the scientists will be able to determine how the magnets should be calibrated to gain the most stable "orbit" of the beams in the ring.

==Safety concerns==
{{Expert|date=March 2008}}
Concerns have been raised that performing collisions at previously unexplored energies might unleash new and disastrous phenomena. These include the production of ]s, and ]s, potentially resulting in a ] scenario.
Such issues were raised in connection with the ] accelerator, both in the media<ref>New Scientist, 28 August 1999: "A Black Hole Ate My Planet"</ref><ref>], an episode of the ] television series ]</ref> and in the scientific community;<ref>W. Wagner, "Black holes at Brookhaven?" and reply by F. Wilzcek, Letters to the Editor, Scientific American July 1999</ref> however, after detailed studies, scientists reached such conclusions as "beyond reasonable doubt, heavy-ion experiments at RHIC will not endanger our planet"<ref>A. Dar, A. De Rujula, U. Heinz, "Will relativistic heavy ion colliders destroy our planet?", Phys. Lett. B470:142-148 (1999) </ref> and that there is "powerful empirical evidence against the possibility of dangerous strangelet production."<ref>W. Busza, R. Jaffe, J. Sandweiss, F. Wilczek, "Review of speculative 'disaster scenarios' at RHIC", Rev. Mod. Phys.72:1125-1140 (2000) </ref>

One argument against such fears is that collisions at these energies (and higher) have been happening in nature for billions of years apparently without hazardous effects, as ]s impact Earth's atmosphere and other bodies in the universe.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://public.web.cern.ch/Public/en/LHC/Safety-en.html|title=Safety at the LHC}}</ref> A concern against this cosmic-ray argument is that, if dangerous strangelets or micro black holes were created at LHC, a proportion would have less than the Earth's ] (of 11.2 km/s), and therefore would be captured by the Earth's gravitational field, whereas those created by high-energy cosmic rays would leave the planet at high speed, due to the laws of ] at relativistic speeds{{Fact|date=March 2008}}.

CERN's review concludes, after detailed analysis, that "there is no basis for any conceivable threat" from strangelets or black holes.<ref>J. Blaizot et al, "Study of Potentially Dangerous Events During Heavy-Ion Collisions at the LHC", </ref><ref> - Physicist Dave Wark of Imperial College, London reporting for '']''</ref> However, the concern about the verity of ] was not addressed, and another study was commissioned by CERN in 2007 for publication on CERN's web-site by the end of 2007.{{Fact|date=February 2008}}

The risk of a doomsday scenario was indicated by ], with respect to the RHIC, as being at least a 1 in 50,000,000 chance,<ref>Cf. ] Report mentioned by ] (Lord), ''Our Final Century: Will the Human Race Survive the Twenty-first Century?'', U.K., 2003, ISBN 0-465-06862-6; note that the mentioned "1 in 50 million" chance is disputed as being a misleading and played down probability of the serious risks (Aspden, U.K., 2006)</ref> and by Professor ], with regards to (dangerous) strangelets, that "the chance of this happening is like you winning the major prize on the lottery 3 weeks in succession; the problem is that people believe it is possible to win the lottery 3 weeks in succession."<ref>BBC ''End Days'' (Documentary) - available from the BBC, or from Youtube.</ref> Accurate assessments of these risks are impossible due to the present incomplete, or even hypothetically flawed, ] of particle physics (see also a list of ]).

===Micro black holes===
{{main|Micro black holes}}
Although the ] of particle physics predicts that LHC energies are far too low to create ]s, some ] posit the existence of extra spatial dimensions, in which it would be possible to create ]s at the LHC<ref>{{cite web|url=http://cerncourier.com/cws/article/cern/29199|title=CERN courier - ''The case for mini black holes. Nov 2004''}}</ref><ref>American Institute of Physics Bulletin of Physics News, Number 558, September 26, 2001, by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, and James Riordon</ref><ref>S. Dimopoulos and G. Landsberg, "Black holes at the LHC",
, </ref> at a rate on the order of one per second. According to the standard calculations these are harmless because they would quickly decay by ]. The concern is that among other disputed factors, Hawking radiation (whose existence is still debated<ref>A. Helfer, "Do black holes radiate?", Rept. Prog. Phys. 66, 943-1008 (2003) </ref>) is not yet an experimentally-tested or naturally observed phenomenon. The opponents to the LHC consider that micro black holes produced in a terrestrial laboratory might not decay as rapidly as calculated, or might even not be prone to decay. According to CERN, physicists in general do not question the assumption that black holes are generally unstable and those few who have pointed out issues with Hawking's radiation were only attempting to achieve a more rigorous proof of it.<ref name=CERNaskexpert>http://askanexpert.web.cern.ch/AskAnExpert/en/Accelerators/LHCblackholes-en.html</ref> CERN further argues that even if micro black holes were created and were stable, they would pose no threat to the Earth during its remaining 5 billion years of existence.<ref name=CERNaskexpert>http://askanexpert.web.cern.ch/AskAnExpert/en/Accelerators/LHCblackholes-en.html</ref><ref name=CERNLSAGoutline>http://lhc2008.web.cern.ch/LHC2008/documents/LSAG.pdf</ref> However, Dr. Adam D. Helfer's thesis concludes "no compelling theoretical case for or against radiation by black holes",<ref>http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/gr-qc/pdf/0304/0304042v1.pdf</ref><ref>http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/gr-qc/pdf/0503/0503052v1.pdf</ref> and Dr. ]'s thesis calculates that Earth accretion time could be as short as 50 months.<ref>http://www.wissensnavigator.com/documents/OTTOROESSLERMINIBLACKHOLE.pdf</ref>

===Strangelets===
{{main|Strangelet}}
]s are a hypothetical form of ] that contains roughly equal numbers of up, down, and strange ] and are more stable than ordinary nuclei. If strangelets can actually exist, and if they were produced at LHC, they could conceivably initiate a runaway fusion process (reminiscent of the fictional ]) in which all the nuclei in the planet were converted to strange matter, similar to a ].

==Legal challenge==
On 21st March 2008 a complaint requesting an injunction against the LHC's startup was filed before the US District Court of Hawaii<ref>{{cite web|url=http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-hidce/case_no-1:2008cv00136/case_id-78717/|title=Federal District Court Filings and Dockets Hawaii}}</ref><ref> - ''Doomsday Fear Sparks Lawsuit''</ref> by a group of seven concerned individuals. This group includes Walter L. Wagner who notably was unable to obtain an injunction against the much lower energy RHIC for similar concerns. ''See: ]''

The restraining order<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.lhcconcerns.com/LHCConcerns/Forums/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=29|title=List of affidavits and temporary restraining order}}</ref> is a demand for an injunction of 4 months time after issuance of the LHC Safety Assessment Group's (LSAG) Safety Review originally promised by January 1, 2008, to review the LHC's most recent safety documentation, after it has been issued, and a permanent injunction until the LHC can be demonstrated to be reasonably safe within industry standards.

==Construction accidents and delays==
On ], ], a technician, José Pereira Lages, was killed in the LHC tunnel when a crane load was accidentally dropped.<ref>{{cite web
| url=http://cosmicvariance.com/2005/10/25/tragedy-at-cern/| title = Tragedy at CERN
| last = Hewett| first = JoAnne|date=25 October 2005| accessdate = 2007-01-15
| format = Blog| publisher = Cosmic Variance
}} ''author and date indicate the beginning of the blog thread''</ref><ref>{{cite press release
|title=Message from the Director-General |publisher=CERN |date=26 October 2005 |accessdate=2007-01-15
|url=http://user.web.cern.ch/user/QuickLinks/Announcements/2005/Accident.html |language=English and French}}</ref>

On ], ], there was an incident during a pressure test involving one of the LHC's inner triplet magnet assemblies provided by ] and ]. No people were injured, but a cryogenic magnet support broke. Fermilab director Pier Oddone stated 'In this case we are dumbfounded that we missed some very simple balance of forces.' This fault had been present in the original design, and remained during four engineering reviews over the following years.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.photonics.com/content/news/2007/April/4/87089.aspx|title=Fermilab 'Dumbfounded' by fiasco that broke magnet}}</ref> Analysis revealed that its design, made as thin as possible for better insulation, was not strong enough to withstand the forces generated during pressure testing. Details are available in a statement from Fermilab, with which CERN is in agreement.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://user.web.cern.ch/user/QuickLinks/Announcements/2007/LHCInnerTriplet_5.html|title=LHC Magnet Test Failure}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.fnal.gov/pub/today/lhc_magnet_archive.html|title=Updates on LHC inner triplet failure}}</ref>

Repairing the broken magnet and reinforcing the eight identical copies used by LHC, in addition to a number of other small delays, caused a postponement of the planned ], ] startup date<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/tvradio/programmes/horizon/broadband/tx/universe/highlights/ |title=The God Particle|accessdate=2007-05-22|work=www.bbc.com}}</ref> to May 2008.<ref>{{cite press release |url=http://press.web.cern.ch/press/PressReleases/Releases2007/PR06.07E.html |date=2007-06-22 |title=CERN announces new start-up schedule for world’s most powerful particle accelerator |publisher=CERN |accessdate=2007-07-01}}</ref>

==See also==
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]

==Notes and references==
{{reflist|2}}

==External links==
{{commons|Large Hadron Collider}}
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
* - Virtual Reality (VR) photography panoramas (requires ])
*
*
*
*

=== Articles ===
*
*
*
*]: . The world’s largest particle accelerator (ca. 6 500 words)
*]: (ca. 4 300 words)
*. The chapter of the LHC Technical Design Report (TDR) that lists of all the beam parameters for the LHC.

{{CERN}}

]
]
]
]

]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Revision as of 19:52, 13 May 2008

OH SHI- I DIVIDED BY ZERO!