| Revision as of 21:23, 17 August 2005 editGamaliel (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators93,886 edits Page protection← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:37, 17 August 2005 edit undoGamaliel (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators93,886 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
| I have protected this page as you have been removing messages and using it as a forum for insults. ] 21:23, 17 August 2005 (UTC) | I have protected this page as you have been removing messages and using it as a forum for insults. ] 21:23, 17 August 2005 (UTC) | ||
| I am also extending your block due to your continuing violation of Misplaced Pages policies. ] 21:37, 17 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:37, 17 August 2005
User:Gamaliel and Joe Scarborough
In response to the message you left on my page I have begun looking into matter. Gamaliel does seem to be involved in a number of edit wars and his manner of dealing with certain anonymous users is interesting. There is a huge paper trail associated with this mess which I will have to wade though before I can respond.
Also, I see that you filed an RFC against Gamaliel. Since you are fairly new I will remind you of the following: :In order to remain listed at Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute, not different disputes. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 22:42, 29 July 2005 (UTC)), the page will be deleted. So you will need someone to support you or it will be deleted. And that may be for the best. Gamaliel is now discussing the Joe Scarborough situation at Talk:Joe Scarborough so the issue may be resolving itself.--Heathcliff 23:18, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
You claim you are acting on behalf of consensus but this is simply not true. Please read and participate in the talk page discussion instead of claiming that the consensus is what you want it to be. Gamaliel 18:00, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
Block
You have been blocked for 24 hours for leaving vulgar personal attacks on my user talk page and that of User:Ruy Lopez. I see from your edit history that this isn't the first time you've left such nasty messages. Perhaps now you will get the hint that they are inappropriate. Gamaliel 19:04, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
Reverts
Please be aware of and adhere to Misplaced Pages:Three revert rule. Gamaliel 16:42, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
my talk page
I told you to stay off my talk page unless you have something constructive to say. Post that same comment for a fourth time and you get blocked for vandalism. Gamaliel 17:54, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
Vandalism of Talk:Joe Scarborough
I've blocked you again for your vandalism of this page, specifically removing votes by Sterling Newberry and Calton. Your past behavior on this page - like inserting comments about "smearing feces" on people who vote in a way you disagree with - leaves no doubt that this was not accidental. Gamaliel 16:14, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
Block
This bit of vandalism has gotten you a third block. Gamaliel 21:08, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
- It wasn't vandalism, its the truth. How long is this block for?
- 72 hours. The blocks get larger each time you vandalize Misplaced Pages. Gamaliel 21:18, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
Page protection
I have protected this page as you have been removing messages and using it as a forum for insults. Gamaliel 21:23, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
I am also extending your block due to your continuing violation of Misplaced Pages policies. Gamaliel 21:37, 17 August 2005 (UTC)