| Revision as of 20:20, 14 May 2008 editRandom832 (talk | contribs)12,146 edits clarify← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:23, 14 May 2008 edit undoRandom832 (talk | contribs)12,146 edits i'd messed up counting at some pointNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| **Cannot be reasonably read as advocating anything. | **Cannot be reasonably read as advocating anything. | ||
| *Moulton recruiting meat puppets at WikipediaReview: , and so on for 4 more pages... {{verify source}} | *Moulton recruiting meat puppets at WikipediaReview: , and so on for 4 more pages... {{verify source}} | ||
| **Links 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11 verified as not supporting this assertion - they don't even contain any vague thoughts about what he thinks articles or other wikipedia pages should look like. | **Links 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12 verified as not supporting this assertion - they don't even contain any vague thoughts about what he thinks articles or other wikipedia pages should look like. | ||
| **Link 10 contains a vague statement that he believes an article has undue weight and ] issues - but does not propose any particular changes. | **Link 10 contains a vague statement that he believes an article has undue weight and ] issues - but does not propose any particular changes. | ||
| **Link 13 is an explanation of a proposal he made before being blocked - it could reasonably be misinterpreted as advocating that edit be made. | **Link 13 is an explanation of a proposal he made before being blocked - it could reasonably be misinterpreted as advocating that edit be made. | ||
Revision as of 20:23, 14 May 2008
Note also no evidence is provided of a community ban discussion having been held.
Evidence of recruiting, directing meatpuppets to continue campaign from WikipediaReview
- Example of Moulton's original editing campaign at Rosalind Picard:
- Moulton's article at WikipediaReview advocating continuing his campaign at Rosalind Picard and James Tour: "So I am disgusted with Misplaced Pages" April 5th, 2008
- Cannot be reasonably read as advocating anything.
- Moulton recruiting meat puppets at WikipediaReview: , and so on for 4 more pages...
- Links 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12 verified as not supporting this assertion - they don't even contain any vague thoughts about what he thinks articles or other wikipedia pages should look like.
- Link 10 contains a vague statement that he believes an article has undue weight and WP:COATRACK issues - but does not propose any particular changes.
- Link 13 is an explanation of a proposal he made before being blocked - it could reasonably be misinterpreted as advocating that edit be made.
- Moulton stating he intends to bring the matter to the press:
- This link goes to a post by User:Derktar. To be fair, another post on the same page (link 8 above) does mention the press.
- A WikipediaReview editor arrives at Rosalind Picard walking in Moulton's footsteps, making the edits he's advocated: May 4, 2008
- Moulton advising meatpuppets on edits on his behalf to scuttle a hard-won consensus: WikipediaReview, May 12, 2008
- Link is to a post about NotTheWikipediaWeekly. TBF, the comment at link 13 above (see above though for problems with this characterization of the comment) is on the same page.
- Brand new user making his first two edits matching Moulton's above requested content word-for-word within hours of Moulton's request: May 12, 2008May 12, 2008 Same, acknowledging he's acted in response to Moulton's call:
- Acknowledgements of directing meatpuppets:
- Acknowledges correspondence, does not state or imply that the nature of the correspondence includes directing anyone to edit articles.