| Revision as of 17:40, 18 May 2008 editשראלהתקווה ' (talk | contribs)9 edits →Kevin Whitton: tends such← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:53, 18 May 2008 edit undoTangerines (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers28,246 editsm commentNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| *'''Delete'''. ] and not notable. ] (]) 12:52, 18 May 2008 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. ] and not notable. ] (]) 12:52, 18 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *<sub>'''Note'''</sub> Merge it with the ] firm artical? He was a member of it.--] (]) 17:40, 18 May 2008 (UTC) | *<sub>'''Note'''</sub> Merge it with the ] firm artical? He was a member of it.--] (]) 17:40, 18 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Comment'''. Not really sure which way to vote to be honest whether to keep or delete. However I have added the info about him - which is sourced as it is mentioned in a book which is viewable on Google Books - on the ] article. I don't believe that it is at all relevant to merge the article though.]·<small>]</small> 19:53, 18 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:53, 18 May 2008
Kevin Whitton
- Kevin Whitton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested prod.Non-notable hooligan, commited assault, went to prison. Nothing to warrant an article. As far as I can see sources only give passing mention to him and do not meet the "significant coverage" required by WP:N Paulbrock (talk) 13:43, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- delete As per nom. I've tried sooooo hard not to give a "!vote as per nom" but to be honest, I can't do anything but that here! The above makes it the point so well - covers all the aspects of WP:N/CA. StephenBuxton (talk) 14:08, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. There are in fact a few sources that mention him. Still, for now looks like a BLP1E case at best. Not enough here to pass WP:BIO at the moment (although there is some chance that there are more sources out there; maybe some-one could do further digging). Nsk92 (talk) 21:09, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:BLP1E. Stifle (talk) 22:45, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:20, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
- There are sources, he may be noable, if we look for him in the right places.--86.29.249.238 (talk) 10:55, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. WP:BLP1E and not notable. KleenupKrew (talk) 12:52, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
- Note Merge it with the Chelsea Headhunters firm artical? He was a member of it.--שראלהתקווה ' (talk) 17:40, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comment. Not really sure which way to vote to be honest whether to keep or delete. However I have added the info about him - which is sourced as it is mentioned in a book which is viewable on Google Books - on the Chelsea Headhunters article. I don't believe that it is at all relevant to merge the article though.♦Tangerines♦·Talk 19:53, 18 May 2008 (UTC)