Revision as of 00:51, 20 May 2008 editKleenupKrew (talk | contribs)1,323 edits →OSBIWiki: delete← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:53, 20 May 2008 edit undoJakew (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers17,277 edits →OSBIWiki: dNext edit → | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>-- ]] 19:21, 19 May 2008 (UTC)</small> | *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>-- ]] 19:21, 19 May 2008 (UTC)</small> | ||
*'''Delete''', yet another non-notable wiki. ] (]) 00:51, 20 May 2008 (UTC) | *'''Delete''', yet another non-notable wiki. ] (]) 00:51, 20 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
*'''Delete'''. Nothing in , , or . ], serious doubts whether it is even ] via third-party sources. ] (]) 19:53, 20 May 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:53, 20 May 2008
OSBIWiki
- OSBIWiki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This is another website which does not meet either WP:WEB or WP:NOTE based on my own external searches and a review of the article content. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 16:50, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- BelovedFreak 19:21, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, yet another non-notable wiki. KleenupKrew (talk) 00:51, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Nothing in News, Books, or Scholar. Non-notable, serious doubts whether it is even verifiable via third-party sources. Jakew (talk) 19:53, 20 May 2008 (UTC)